Can you explain why that was acceptable vs. say releasing all of the images/videos from the massive celebrity leak? Many of the actors and actresses had openly discussed their sex lives, but gawker took the stance that did not put it in the public right to access. Yet with Hogan it was different why?

But Gawker was so quick to defend and side with J-Law during fapgate, why is it ok in Hogans case?

Then you should have no problem with Ziff Davis scorching the Earth around here, eh?

Do you have a problem with it now?

If someone’s sex life is news, you may just be a stupid tabloid.

Not a surprise. Largely this site (aside from io9) is filled with trash human beings behaving like trash.

If someone posted a sex tape of you that you weren’t aware existed and did not permit to be posted, you wouldn’t sue the people who posted it? You can say that unequivocally?

I wouldn’t post that publicly if I was you.

What about the video of that girl getting raped then telling her to deal with it?

Enjoy your unemployment then. This comment will make sure you will not get a job as an actual journalist.

And this is why you deserve to be shut down. You’re not 4chan and shouldn’t aim to drag yourself down into the same depths of nonexistent ethical standards.

How would you feel if Gawker put up a video of your wife fucking another man? Successful author, media figure...

I would go as far to say that the Mustang driver felt threatened with bodily harm. He tried to slow down and the guy on the bike matched his speed. He wouldn’t be able to outrun the bike if he tried so he didn’t have a lot of options. I’m not saying he chose the right one but put yourself in his shoes and think about…

Cue the motorcycle riders who let other riders get away with this behavior by defending them at every turn....

Usually I feel for these bikers, as a biker myself, but I would NEVER ride along side a car like that for any amount of time, not even just to flip the guy off. Youre asking for it.

If I am reading this correctly, you impute a lot of ‘blame’ on Helwani for what is a violation of some journalistic ethic in covering the UFC (in covering a sport). Perhaps I have a twisted view of the so called profession, but there is no such thing as journalism in the 21st century in covering sports. It’s…

Money’s on the dresser, don’t act surprised, you knew what this was....

try to ride a pig, and you’ll end up covered in shit.

Giving an example, Helwani said that he asked Travis Browne before an interview whether he could ask questions about rumors of his relationship with fellow UFC star Ronda Rousey. Browne checked in with Rousey and okayed the questions

Foolish move to play him considering his most famouse quote ever was,

If you haven’t seen When We Were Kings, you should use this as an excuse to watch it.