Nothing about historical fiction states how accurate it has to be.
Nothing about historical fiction states how accurate it has to be.
They quoted one native american? Oh great, that settles it. We’re done, outrage approved. It’s certainly not a case of a bunch of entitled white people getting one answer they like and then building a case on it. Nope, no sir, not here.
Also, the conversation-obliterating “concern troll” bullshit needs to die in a goddamned fire.
“There are fantasy novels where magic is real and it’s historically accurate.”
Uhhh, but just because those things exist doesn’t mean that’s the standard. Not by any means.
At least this article is filed appropriately. It starts out re-iterating already-discussed problems with J.K. Rowlings generalizations of Native Americans, lumping them all up as a single group, etc, etc.