I’m equating people who enjoy harassing and terrorizing strangers for shit that is none of your business (i.e. you) and people who laugh at rape victims (idk, probably you again).

Right. I am ok with the suspension because he broke a rule and someone got hurt. Sort of a strict liability where his intent doesn’t matter. Acting like what he did is worse than hurling a baseball at someone’s head, with clear intent, is preposterous.

Government officials don’t embezzle money, they take bribes and kickbacks.

You mean a wedding cake for a gay wedding, right? I think something like 99.8% of bakers would bake a wedding cake for a gay couple no problem. Which of course is no reason to not harass and terrorize the .2% that quietly decline because of their deeply held religious beliefs.

And I’m sure the fact that this got pushed down the front page real quick-like is a total coincidence.

You also laugh at women who get raped when they walk down a dark alley alone at night?

I read the statement that Emmitt Smith often didn’t get touched until three yards down the field (an overstatement) together with the statement that Barry Sanders was “on a whole separate level” as shitting on Emmitt Smith.

For some reason this pitcher isn’t a “red ass” - can’t put my finger on it...

Something tells me if this were Madison Bumgardner throwing at Puig after Puig plowed over Buster Posey, the analysis here would be VERY different. 

Actually if it was intentional it wasn’t reckless. Recklessness requires that the action, while not intentional, is reasonably likely (and you know of should know that it is reasonably likely) to cause harm. If you are randomly throwing bricks off an overpass you are being reckless, if you are aiming at cars you are…

You have not provided a thoughtful comment so you are not entitled to a thoughtful response. Take your false piety and righteousness and get fucked.

So giving equal time and giving time are two different things. You seem to be suggesting that by giving any time they are giving equal time. Surely you see that isn’t true.

Yes, he had principles, which to him mattered more than carrying out his sworn duties as a supreme court justice.  Some people think that is ok and some don’t. 

The lady doth protest too much.

Wow dude, read what your wrote. Really read it.

That is quite the unnecessary defense of a fucking stupid argument.

Yes.

Funny how it is always the other side that is going too far, that is going beyond politics, that is creating some obsequious call to action upon themselves. No one has ever found the courage to say “I was and am fully on board with my political party, but we are delegitimizing the fundamental tenets of our society…

The PGA Championship isn’t run by the PGA Tour? Honestly asking, but I always thought that one was and if it doesn’t it is really confusing.

It is amazing how good people are at seeing the “brainwashed idiots” that generally disagree with them.