I'm the one that offered forth an actual argument. You're the one trying to escape.

I have three Kinja accounts, this being my newest. Indeed, I've been "running around Jalop" far longer than you have. Go back to I09, loser.

I know diesel engines have huge stroke:bore ratios and a meter is obviously a huge bore.... but I feel like a 1 meter bore is teeny tiny for an engine that's this big. And a 3 meter stroke doesn't seem to big either. Are the cylinder walls really THAT thick for this engine?

Comments:

You're not even a Jalop. Don't come into our forums just to rage and complain.

First of all: Nice clickbait/overreaction title for this article.

NSX out front, Citroen GT out back. Not bad.

Everything VW.

Same as the old car. Except the horrific front end. Ech. Ew. It actually is hard to look at.

"Bentley" V8. More like Audi parts incest.

And some of those assets are novelties like the UAW's private golf course. Not even kidding. Google it

I'm sorry, but it looks the same as the old one. And it loses its N/A engine. Fail.

Horacio Pagani was right. McLaren is getting boring due to engine sharing. Their 3.8 TT V8 will now be spread across four models, ranging from $150K to $1.15M. Lame.

When a "Union"(UAW) has billions in assets and novelties like their own private Golf Course, they are no longer serving their true purpose and must be put under control.

Colorado is their own Florida.

.....And this is why naturally aspirated engines will always rule.

McLaren definitely beat the Porsche. The Porsche got a 6:57 and McLaren said they did it under 7 minutes. The chance is slim to none tha McLaren happened to get between those times and didn't try any harder to beat the Porsche. The most logical reason they did not release their time is A. They beat Porsche and are…

Woah. I didn't know the V6 was pushing that much boost. That's very interesting. The Jaaaaaaaggg 3.0 S/C V6 and the Audi 3.0 S/C V6 suspiciously similar. Both share identical bores of 3.33 and strokes of 3.5 with very similar mid-10's compression ratios. Probably just coincidence, because the Jag V6 is supposedly…

Yes, they are more reliable than turbos, but it will be relatively unreliable if it's running a ton of boost. That would be great if you could! I'd really like to know how much PSI the blower is putting out!

The closest I could find is this: With very similar engine architecture, the older supercharged 4.2 in the XKR required 12 PSI for 390 horsepower and 399 ft/lbs.