Uh huh...
Uh huh...
Your analogy is off, it’d be more like the US Marines kill an enemy and try to tell you “Oh this? This isn’t a gun. It’s only a gun if a bad guy uses it”.
Well to make your analogy work, it would be like the government dosing the water supply with chemotherapy, and not targeting it at individual cancer patients.
Saying it’s not malware would be like saying the weapon used by the marine in your analogy to shoot someone isn’t a gun because the marine works for us.
They’re actually arguing that their end justifies any means. That’s fucking terrifying.
The FBI has had a sterling history of good intentions
Shinji get in the fucking ice rink.
That really looks good.
That’s because bad sex isn’t rape - because it’s consentual. It’s simply bad sex.
I would put more blame on the author trying to turn bad sex into "rape".
Small sample sizes makes baby Jesus cry.
We need these people to tell us how we are raped, because clearly we don't understand.
It’s important to note, according to the researchers, that none of the women used words like “rape” or “coercion,” even though the sex they described could reasonably be categorized that way. Instead, they merely described it as “bad sex”
Oh man, this covers it all!
For example, women used the term ‘bad’ to describe sex that was both unwanted and unpleasurable.
Two things come to mind reading this article:
I’ll meet you, and raise.
Because the whole angle Sony seems to be going for is gendering everything, flipping those genders, waiting for angry responses, and then spinning it into free PR selling the film as a rallying flag for ‘progressives’.