I concur. This is a "I'll take it off your hands if you pay me $100" car.
You know what is odd, I almost got dyslexic with all the alphabet soup letters. GM should just call the next RWD Caddy, a Deville. Simple and elegant.
Until the cost of keeping it running, plus calculated fuel savings from a newer car, exceed what we'd have to finance. Otherwise, we'll just keep saving to buy with cash on the sad day one of our cars meets that calculated threshold of attrition.
We confirmed with the NTSB that Mazda's lead engineer on the project is Mr. Ho Lee Fuk.
with how many lawns you could mow in a day, this should surely pay for itself over the next 250 years
Again, Vic, read the story. This is a program where they ARE turning over data to private companies, in some cases, where there's no government oversight at all. You don't see anything questionable about that?
I like the idea. I even appreciate that he kept the engine swap in the family instead of going SBC. However, the execution reveals the builder to be completely retarded. Sorry boys, but I'm going CP on this. Never buy a car from a retard.
How about a Battalion of Pontiac Aztecs?
Maybe because OEM carbon ceramics from Ferrari come standard with that setup?
I tried killing it with fire, but the headliner kept putting it out!
Absolutely. Its business, not personal. You are not there to make friends.
Lead acid batteries with the same capacity require much more weight and space. You need a bigger airplane to accommodate the batteries. You then need more fuel to carry the extra weight of the batteries and bigger airplane. You then need more fuel to carry that extra fuel. You then need larger fuel tanks to carry…
I mean, we literally have no idea what caused this fire. Blaming the batteries again is tempting, but in no way a sure thing. Could be anything.
I've walked away from two so far. So glad I did, any dealer willing to let you walk away from a reasonable offer should be suspect.
That's the best advice right there.