Signing a contract to do work for someone more powerful than you for less money than you’d prefer is just called, “Having a job,” and “having a boss.”

Fuck right off. She CHOSE to sign the contract, she CHOSE to do the scene for the money that was offered. If she didn’t like the offer for the gig (sounds like she was only in a scene or two), she could have found another gig since this one clearly wasn’t a full time job for her.

The offer was put in front of her,…

It is a normal age to be sexually experimenting. We’ve collectively decided they are capable of giving consent. Can 17 year olds get screwed over by older partners because they don’t have much experience? Sure. But this seems to not be the case here.

What duress? She could have literally just not signed it. Nobody was making her, she wasn’t in danger. Nobody was holding her parents hostage. She read a contract to appear nude for shit money and went, “I’ll do this, twice.”

Dude, you don’t have to sign a contract to appear nude for money in a movie. It’s super simple. She’s a movement hanger-on.

“remember a few weeks ago when you told me the full nudity you had me do in two of your movies for $100/day wasn’t exploitative because I signed a contract to do it? Times up on that”

So is nudity in any movie or show then considered exploitation no matter what, even when there is a contract? If so, I’m genuinely curious how, or even if you truly can, have scenes in film with nudity anymore.

This line of reasoning is nuts. This is a grown woman, completely infantilizing herself and asking you to buy the idea that she has no agency or free will in the presence of someone so powerful. Like, his powerful aura hypnotized her into signing up to do a job for money.

Yeah, but that’s not sexual misconduct, which is what this article called it.

To an extent, but is exploitation just any job you didn’t want to do for less money than you’d like? Because if so most jobs count. In an article about potential sexual assault, “his contracts don’t pay very well” seems like a weirdly petty thing to include.

If he did do some of those things he’s clearly horrible, but “my wages to do a nude scene weren’t as high as I would like” is a really lukewarm inclusion in this.

So Jane’s Franco hitting on a 17 is wrong but a movie about a 17 year old boy falling into a relationship with a grown man is the romance story of the year? Seems like a double standard.

Wow. Definitely a SciFi movie. The SciFi part is believing that a woman with Jennifer Lawrence’s figure could be a ballet dancer.

Whoa whoa whoa she’s not Tatiana Maslany good. She is good and adorable in the role though.

I understand why many people didn’t like The Fall (and the third series was a bit disappointing), but for those of us who had the patience to make it through, the final episode of the second series gave us some of the best scenes Anderson will ever film. I will avoid spoilers since you are still watching, but goddamn…

She’s a helluva actor. Started watching the Fall recently and she’s fantastic there too.

Counterpoint: These two fuckers are douchebro assholes fleecing people for being idiots.

Not exactly justice, but it’s nice to see this piece of shit’s career falling apart.

He’s an actor. Part of his stock in trade is public goodwill. Is it now his employers’ responsibility to absorb the hit to his good name?

Not the raping, the negative fallout from the raping. Raping is fine and dandy in Scientology and thus not a problem