Eh, yes and no. Usually you'll see pieces pertaining to the special effects, character designs, overall plot points (leaks, usually), etc.

Dude, you've already decided exactly who and what you think I am, my motivations, my SOP, etc. Nothing I can say or do is going to shake you of a bunch of preconceived notions/strawman bullshit that you based entirely off of a one-sentence quip.

"Then you should probably not throw a little psycho tanty everytime someone discusses anything with you."

Yep. Literally every damn time.

And gay womenpeople?

What, the initial comment or continuing it? The initial comment was an observation that apparently ruffled feathers (didn't think it was all that hot of a take, but whatever).

Eh, I guess that argument could be made. It just seems like another effort (to be fair, this isn't an AVC exclusive thing - this story is making the rounds) to shift focus from the overall quality/content of the movie to elements that are outside of the movie's scope. This flick is a summer popcorn movie that got…

Get ready to duck, man…

Head to twitter or Reddit! They'll be glad to give you some nuanced discussion!

Wow. You're completely averse to actually discussing things like a human being, huh? By all means, keep a'building that strawman.

How many AVC articles have discussed the actual substance of the movie? One, as far as I can remember. How many AVC thinkpieces have been done on it? Many. THAT was my point. I thought that was pretty fucking clear.

Satyrs. You fuck the two t's: Tumnus and Torgo.

Yep, gotta be it. I made a comment about the fact that most of the coverage of this movie has essentially hobbled its chances at getting a fair shot, so yep, feeling mighty threatened by what amounts to a summer popcorn flick.

Right. Because pedantry is fucking useless. It isn't about discussion, it's about scoring points.

She doesn't come to where you work and slap the dick out of your mouth.

"Apollo Creed was created as an Irish dude in blackface. Your move, twitter."

A whole lot of people, apparently.

We're going to go down the rabbit hole of "usefulness" on a fucking entertainment site comment section? Really?

And you could always not respond to certain comments. It's pretty useful if someone makes a comment you disagree with. Always a winning strategy. Though, yeah, I guess we're on the Internet, wherein every contrary opinion needs must be responded to. My mistake.

That's cool. My issue is with the fact that the lion's share of the coverage has been either "This sucks becuz reasons" or "What does this meeeeeeean, you guys!?" in nature.