Sounds like he was trying to make a broader point about repression leading to abusive behavior rather than the specific cases but okay let's drag him
Sounds like he was trying to make a broader point about repression leading to abusive behavior rather than the specific cases but okay let's drag him
On a night when I was underwhelmed and bored by 98% of the gowns, Porter’s made me gasp. Then swoon with delight. It’s an absolutely stunning, gorgeous look on him. I love love love it.
I agree with your take on the rewind. Most of the time that kind of thing drives me crazy because it’s a lazy way to write yourself out of a corner, but the use of the convention here was tragic because of the positive character growth it wiped away.
I’m three episodes in (maybe four? It was late when I stopped for the night), and I just don’t get the eye-rolling that the reviewer is doing at every possible chance. Especially with the rundown of the characters. Just a little bit of empathy and insight wipes away most of the “mysteriously” from each description…
Yeah but a big part of the reason why SNL had him on was because they thought he was a joke. I don’t think they’d ever do something like that again, knowing what we all know now. The whole culture underestimated his appeal, right up until election night and certainly at the time when he hosted SNL. A big part of the…
Cue the people who think that some people don’t deserve fair trials if they have a feeling the person is guilty anyways.
If that picture isn’t a perfect distillation of 400 plus years of white colonialism, I don’t know what is.
That's all well and good, but I'm still waiting to learn how, exactly, does one suck a fuck.
I saw it. It only really hits “so bad, it’s good” in the last shot. Before that, it hovers, like Dowd said, in “so bad it’s kind of unbelievable.” I kinda dug the first act because it played like a trashy Frankenstein homage, but at that point, I thought the writer would know how to pay it off or knew what a pay off…
That’s been rod my complaints about the season- that 13 was mainly just quirky and a series of tics. She never felt commanding,in part because the episodes were so low stakes. This was the first time 13 felt like somebody who was capable ofsavong the universe time after time after time.
Agreed. How can the moment be, “I’m a gay man, watch me sensually dance with this hot chick”? But I guess he’s wrestling with God.
What sane person would come out to their imprisoned father through an choreographed number at the lockup? To the adoration of fellow inmates and Frank? Like, they tick that box you explicitly lay out and you are like “nah, not like that!”.
He could just reprise Josh, since he is a vampire who does not age.
It is a coping mechanism, honestly. The trauma of losing a loved one is very big, so the mind very quickly goes to a conclusion that will provide closure and allow one to move on, because no one can be sad and uncertain for that long before it consumes them. It’s mental gymnastics as a survival tool. That is why the…
Don’t get me started on Kratz. If there ever was ground for mistrial, this is it. He completely contaminated the potential jury pool by going on the air and laying it all out in grizzly details as if it were facts when there’s no evidence to support it.
I think the problem is that the state has told them, repeatedly, that Avery and Dassey ARE the real killers. They lost their sister and want to direct that grief, that sadness and that anger at someone...anyone. Listen to the statement the brother makes at Brendan’s trial. Even though there’s no evidence of sexual…
How is it callous and arrogant exactly? If there is real evidence that they convicted the wrong man or at the VERY least, that there was prosecutorial misconduct, why wouldn’t they want to go over that with the family of the victims? I know if someone was wrongly imprisoned for my family members death, I would want…
“They don’t do colleges because their fees are too high for colleges to afford.”