Your apparently belief that someone deserves respect simply because they are in a position of authority is terrifying. That’s not... sarcasm. I mean when you remind me that people think that way, it’s terrifying. Blind respect for leaders is how atrocities get committed. I’d say that he needs to earn respect through…

Eh, skewering political figures through satire is as old as time itself. It’s just that the idiocy of God Emperor Tiny Hands gives us so much low hanging fruit.

It shouldn’t have consequences. That’s what America is about? Freedom of speech? if you don’t like it and want a place where the leader is given support no matter whatever stupid shit he does, go to north korea.

That’s not the fault of the people. That’s the fault of the President-Elect. Bush Jr. was a buffoon, but he at least held enough decorum to be respected as a legitimate President. Trump is both a demagogue bull rampaging through our fragile systems purely on narcissistic motivations, and he does not deserve that…

Obama isn’t a demagogic asshole who cynically uses the worst, most base impulses of people to propel him to power.

No matter how you approach it, an Uncharted movie is wholly and completely unnecessary. Naughty Dog already made four brilliant movies, they just happen to feature some interactive sequences.

That said, Carnahan is a legitimately talented guy, and good on Sony for hiring someone that can bring something genuinely…

And despite the fact that your definition of “adult material” has been present in both previous seasons it wasn’t until “THE GAYES!” became involved that you had a problem. Your entire screed was about the LGBT people being on there an you completely ignored the fact that the material has already been present.

“At least I’m not the one so bent out of shape over their own opinions that I feel the need to disparage anyone over them.”

lol bent out of shape? You’re ranting to a bunch of strangers, on a forum that no one responsible for the tv show will ever read, your plans to boycott a cartoon, volunteering information about…

Your masking your obvious bias behind your overly simplistic understanding of biology, genetics and so on. At the end of the day your words ultimately add up to I think LBGTQ is abnormal/disgusting and have no interest in the concepts being showing in any type of positive light to my children.

It is an implicit, long-unquestioned norm that doesn’t reflect reality. I don’t see what ‘necessity’ has to do with it.

So a few years ago I took my sister on a field trip with me to the art museum in philly (for my undergrad English lit class) there were some girls in my class who were in a lesbian relationship

Adult material MEANS adult material, not just one side of it.

Any show that acknowleges emotional romantic connection between men and women and doesn’t acknowledge that those connections exist between men and men and woman and women is pushing a sexual agenda a dangerous one.

Human necessity?

No, it’ll damage them if they’re told they shouldn’t see it on TV. Kids aren’t stupid. They’ll figure that if they can’t watch it, it must be bad.

Adult matters like abandonment, death and accidentally lobotomizing your friends who are deep undercover? Those are probably adult subject matters to tackle after ‘some guys would rather kiss other guys.’

Sexual agenda?

So you don’t let them be exposed to any sort of romantic material at all? I don’t really get what you’re saying.

Isn’t the decision to never portray queer characters also a sexual agenda — just one that happens to have been the implicit norm for decades? You have it backwards — including queer characters as well as straight ones is the only way to avoid advancing any particular sexual agenda.

ok you are just terrifying. backing off.