"What if there is physical evidence? What if there rapist has criminal history? For the judge that make the comment that didn't matter."

This kind of shit is why people don't take the people on this website seriously. Grow the fuck up.

No, i'm not for the death penalty, and i'm not sure how this parallels this in any way. I also disagree that "most if not all laws end up inadvertently throwing someone under the bus". That is absurd.

You are correct because presumably you are a person who deals with reality instead of ideals that they feel must be upheld over all else, even reason or facts.

"Better it be a tiny number of men who showed questionable judgment by having sex with someone drunk enough that this could ever be an issue"

Or you could live in reality and observe things that actually happen there. "How is the jury supposed to react?" How is this unreasonable when the standard is that innocence is presumed? Juries should just start convicting every single person charged with rape because the statistics are not in their favor? That's not…

She's not trying to "fix the problem". She's commenting on a legal reality. That exists. As opposed to some ridiculous "how her words could be taken" standard that exists on this website.

"Telling women they can't drink with their friends when it is inherent to the culture is not acceptable."

Getting black out drunk isn't part of a normal life. What an idiotic parallel.

Because that is the topic being discussed in this particular piece.

Exactly. No one can have an honest intellectual conversation about this because every time it's brought up a bunch of idiots post condescending .gifs and 50 people write "No one cares about your boner".

Holy shit that is amazing

Do you have the name of one of them?

Seriously consider killing yourself.

I remember the first 20 times this article was written.

The best part is the cop who turns around once the fighting breaks out and walks away like "fuck this."

What a completely beside the point observation. Men are obviously rude assholes but if a woman does the exact same thing she should be given the benefit of the doubt because she was *probably* touched at some point and thus for the rest of her life gets two subway seats to herself.

People that are rude to wait staff are the absolute scum of humanity. No she's not "beautiful, intelligent, well-traveled, well-educated, fashionable, and accomplished in her field", she's a fucking piece of shit who thinks that she is better than everyone else on the planet. And by associating with her you're sending…

Yeah this won't end with some other nut throwing rocks or a knife at him probably huh?

Look I sympathize but this seems to pretty clearly be a frivolous lawsuit which is at most trying to kick some dirt on People. Even if everything she said was true it's not a crime for a magazine to cater to it's demographic.