I want this statement on my tombstone.
I want this statement on my tombstone.
“Dab dab”? WTF?! DAB DAB?! NO IT’S WIPE! If you’re a dude, it does not matter which direction you wipe, so long as you’re THOROUGH! But if you’re a lady, you’re potentially accidentally wiping poo into your vag.
Mea Culpa, I didn’t read the article. I just want to share a weird poop story.
I hear you. I think the meme shared hit the nail on the head. It is racist as hell, but is also a real depiction of what that group is. It isn’t a religious organization, it is a well organized group of pimps and hos taking full advantage of their marks. Literally sucking the economic prosperity out of black…
And just to hit the point home a little more:
ZING! Take your star!
If this is “racist”, then the Wayans bros need nice firm reprimand as well... Afterall, isn’t their stereotypical valley girl schtick exceptionally sexist? (and racist. I know this is more about throwing it in wypipos faces, but if you’re going to throw hands you better be ready to catch a couple)
What’s your point?
Part of me wants to give kudos for the sole fact that this guy owned up to it and before it came out in a wikileaks-like news cycle, but then he shatters all good will with how condescending he is as he mansplains how “easily offended” people are now vs 10 years ago.
I just wanted to comment here, the loss of Splinter sucks. The hits this group has as whole have taken sucks. I am saddened that what was great journalism has been reduced to a handful of sites whose contributors are told to shut-up and stay in their lane. (Not you or this page in particular, just all of the sites in…
Ya, WTF is she searching his phone/interwebs history for. This was not an accidental “oh, what’s this?” moment. Not when she clearly analyzed that he had the same site 4x or more times in his history and then felt the need to confront him about it.
TL;DR: Yes, if you like PVE content, pick it up.
Ok ok, follow me for a second.
How about actually voting to impeach due to brazen public admissions of guilt? Including this overt attempt at obstruction of justice.
Lulz, not when international relations with allies are involved. And it is a well known tactic to ensure there are “no receipts” from the shake down.
A lot of people are finding out the hard way right now that our gov’t has been run on the honor system of those in power behaving as if their decisions affect the lives of millions, and by extension billions, of people.
Fuck this judge on point 1, there is no way in HELL these jurors should consider the castle doctrine in this case, unless it is to further absolve Jean posthumously of even the possibility of wrong doing whatsoever. In fact, they should consider it in his defense. She busted into HIS house. Breaking and entering,…
I know it seems that way, but that is not how our legal system works. The prosecution pushes narratives that would have outcomes of a guilty verdict and maximum allowable sentencing while the defense pushes narratives that would have outcomes of not-guilty verdicts and minimum allowable sentencing.
Ah, so she is responsible not only for her actions, but the actions of everyone she’s ever been in contact with and her entire family tree.
I know this is an emotional case, but to outright dismiss this person’s emotional response to killing someone is pretty cras. I mean, yes she is guilty and she is outright admitting it, but that does not mean she intended to kill this man or did it out of some kind of racial hostility, nor does it mean she can’t be…