The ‘problem’ is we’ve tried this before. And it hasn’t helped boys.

Yes yes yes. These dumbasses thought Obamacare was something different from the ACA and now that they have learned it’s the same fucking thing, suddenly it’s “don’t take away my healthcare!” They were fine taking it away from the mythical lazy negroes and Mexicans, though, of course.

Is it a matter of “the squeaky wheel gets the grease”? As in, male prisoners are more likely to act out, be violent, and these resources are more likely to alleviate those problems. Female prisoners are less likely to act out, and they might be perceived as less in need of these resources. It isn’t right and it isn’t…

While I understand that males are underperforming and this is their way of trying to deal with that, I will say as someone who attended single sex education, and who’s high school guy friends went to an all-boys school I would say without a doubt that I would never send my son to an all-boys school. I always found…

Don’t most studies show that girls benefit more from sex-segregated schools then boys do? *wanders off to find source*

Trump’s approval rating is approaching the percentage of fuckwits in America. They may only be a percentage or two apart, but I doubt his approval will drop below, say 33%. Those idiots love that he lies all the time, love that he’s destroying America, and love love love being assholes just like him.

This is so infuriating. A friend of mine who works in prison reform describes exactly the same dynamic in prisons: resources, libraries, classes, etc. — the vast, vast majority of funds go to male prisons whereas the women are left totally dry. I do not understand one iota how this is acceptable nor how we countenance…

This is the administration firing back with big loud cannons, a bully hitting the weaker nerds after getting owned in his last fights.

Immigrants are among the least likely group in the US to commit crimes and make up a rather small percentage of the prison population. On the flip side, a rise in immigration (but legal and illegal) has been found to contribute to market expansion, generally improve the economy, and an expanding economy means more…

If we lived in a truly equal society, being a minority in your country would never mean living under injustice. No one should be scared to be in the minority.

This is just a badly veiled attempt to punish urban centers, where the majority of voters don’t support Trump or the GOP. That, plus a good heap of racism. Hitler did it with Berlin when he first took power, and Trump is doing that with major US cities, including DC (a sanctuary city).

Immigration policy already focuses extremely strongly on the ones committing crimes. Virtually every crime outside of disorderly conduct and simple trespassing can get even green-card holders deported. If you’ve been here legally for forty years, and you get caught smoking a joint in public, you can be deported. Same…

As a side note, I checked your posting history, and am not the slightest bit surprised to see you’re a brand-new poster whose first post is today, and the majority of your posts have been anti-immigrant or making fun of people for being pro-immigrant.

It’s like he WANTS TV cameras to tape mass protests against him. Because that’s what’s going to happen. In Boston, they’ve said they’re willing to let people camp out safely inside City Hall, which should make for some interesting visuals.

Nobody is saying what this is really about - self-deportations. The government is well aware that it lacks the resources to round up over 10 million people. It simply cannot do it. What it CAN do, however, is create such a climate of fear and distrust that people will begin to voluntarily leave. The next things we see…

Donald’s team is desperate for a win, which they define as anything which pisses off liberals. I think I’m going to start a petition in my own city to stop asking about immigration status.

The thousands and thousands of immigrants in these sanctuary cities are making America less safe. For example, one of them shot somebody two years ago.

The rule of law has been temporarily suspended because the party in charge won’t enforce it on itself.

The “rule of law” does not apply to Republican politicians in America.

Okay, I’m not American, so please explain to me: why is this man still in post, rather than being done for perjury? For all its flaws, the UK would have had him on the carpet by now. Where is your rule of law?