Misuse of definite article "the" when she should have used the indefinite "a".
Misuse of definite article "the" when she should have used the indefinite "a".
Like others, I have to disagree with the "generally monstrous depiction" of Jordan concept. I don't see what else they realistically could have done with the character given that it had to be a genuine counterpoint to Dr. Cox, a "monster" in his own right. Sure, Jordan as a character by herself was a horrible person,…
Well, a love shack is a little old place where we can get together, so maybe the same thing, but for radios?
Guy Pearce and whoever wrote his lines saved that movie. Some great quips and he delivered them perfectly. Shame he didn't get more attention for that role.
They kinda had to, since it happened in the books and drives a large portion of the plot from that point forward…
The hatred Ailes fostered through the media caused many, many deaths, both directly with things such as fostering hatred that resulted in violence towards minorities, and indirectly with things such as opposition to health care reform that resulted in preventable deaths. If hatred caused his death, I attribute that to…
Jinder being Jinder means that he's losing on Sunday, but the WWE law of reverse momentum does reinforce that, yes.
I guess that's better than the other way around.
Couple of things on that:
That's what I assumed as well, that people were snarkily calling them than in response to what you describe.
While the execution was bad, I see what they were going for with Dean Ambrose.
Well, I don't think people actually thought they'd go through with it. They thought all the votes before were strictly symbolic because the GOP knew they'd get vetoed.
FCC needs to read its own FAQ:
That's way too many walker scenes these days. Walkers have become mostly scenery or contrived obstacles.
It's snark. Welcome to AV Club, it's obviously your first visit.
There is ALREADY and ONLY ONE definitive chart on how to be a man, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
He's still an insensitive clod. There's no good reason to be talking about her past troubles that soon after her death, while those who care about her are still mourning. If an interviewer wants to talk about it, you CAN say no, don't blame it all on the interviewer. The networks exploiting that or reporting things…
Well, by definition it's not "extra" if you do it every night…
Yes, I would. There's NO reason to even be mentioning ANYTHING like that this close to the death while friends and family are still mourning.
I noticed that as well. Hilarious, although it's obvious it was implied.