No, that’s still illegal.

I guess Super Mario World *was* made before they had “do not take apart or reverse engineer or modify the Software” clauses in TOS agreements.

Sure. This thing is a TAS of a level that was made by modifying Nintendo’s game in a prohibited way though.

You’re being pretty vague about the general “Nintendo decisions”. This specific decision makes sense.

They don’t want consumers confused when they search for videos of cool new Mario levels and they get ones made on unauthorized software, which has lots of options Mario Maker doesn’t. Taking down the videos also has the advantage of inhibiting the use of such unauthorized software, which people who don’t own Wii Us…

It’s usually a pirated copy — let’s face it, way more people download emulators than buy cartridge data dumping devices. And even when it isn’t, while keeping a backup copy is fair use (depending on your local laws!), running it on unauthorized hardware is not.

I definitely won’t forget about 9/11, I’ve been excited for it for days now!

‭

I’m not complaining, I’m actually suggesting the Scott Adams article

If this is newsworthy, the next headline could be “Scott Adams, the old adventure games developer who gets mistaken for the writer of Dilbert”

I’m so pumped for 9/11!

also, they don't have any brazil

r.i.p. springpad

It’s not like that anymore, it’s random

look, I get the reasons why you think ms. pac man is better (I see no reason to rank them, whatever) but I don’t know why you think being a more luck based game is a quality

.

if I had done one I’d just put an egg over Slender Man’s face (it’s pretty much already done) but I only just seen this

the reviews have worth, for example if you go to the dark souls 2 page the reviews warn you of the upcoming version that will make this one obsolete

if you don't want shitty software from stupid fucking companies then they should also get rid of the Steam client

get rid of