Because the parent didn’t commit the crime, dingdong. As a human being, why would you hold someone responsible for a crime they didn’t commit?
Because the parent didn’t commit the crime, dingdong. As a human being, why would you hold someone responsible for a crime they didn’t commit?
Anyone looking for the supposed pinnacle of civilization is hopefully looking elsewhere by this point.
“Tell it to a Judge.”
George has been 100% behind this project all the way. Those of us who are of a certain age here in California knew victims and eyewitnesses, and if we were very lucky we, as I am, to have known people who are willing to talk about it, and speak share something so personal, degrading, and tragic in the interest of…
And you know perfectly well that if copyright and patent protections aren’t enforced, artists won’t get paid, so GTFO.
And fuck art and artists, too, amirite?
Legally speaking, yeah. That’s the whole point of a trial. To prove guilt. If you can cast enough doubt on the idea that you committed the crime, it’s the other side’s job to prove you did.
Using Youtube was a bad example. However, you are unbelievably condescending. (I’m aware of the irony.)
I don’t even know why you’d put blame on the child. Even with a properly protected WiFi network, it’s so easy to crack, you can put blame on nearly anyone. You can go on Youtube right now and learn to do it in an afternoon.
No, passing on a double yellow is being an asshole. Swerving to intimidate and kill is [attempted (edit)] murder. Asshole is much lower on the scale.
What kind of sociopath thinks trying to kill someone over a traffic infraction is equivalent to the traffic infraction?
Harmlessly passing someone in a no passing zone isn’t being an “asshole” . Trying to murder two people is.
even though thats only a two second loop, tcsi, i still think it went on too long to be donnie.
The problem is that Hollywood has a tendency to cast white people in place of people of color on the regular, from the old days where they would put actors in assorted “face” make up to just writing them out of the story. So the question is if the creative team’s choices are being influenced by their biases- that is,…
I don’t think hiring Scarlett Johansson to play Motoko Kusanagi was an issue of creativity, artistic freedom, or the director’s view on appropriate casting. I think it was entirely about wanting to market an already successful, high profile actress to American moviegoers.
i bet his fucking face is even more repellant.
This article keeps getting needed, doesn’t it? Please read it, not just the title.
Here’s the frightening thing about Fusion:
This is terrific. Everyone needs a cribsheet to follow all the players.
The way ICE has been going at immigrants these last months is terrifying. It makes me think they have just been waiting for years to get permission to get so aggressive. I wonder how many racists/bigots are in employed by them.