So if they would have hampered the Taycan and made it lose in everything vs even an old Model S, you’d be okay with that because its not news, its entertainment?

Raven has a LOT better performance and handling. I suggest you read about the Raven upgrade, especially after the software upgrade that unlocked its capabilities.

Are you saying the only people who care about credibility and accuracy are those who love Tesla?

The Raven isn’t simply a suspension upgrade (not sure when a suspension redesign was ever considered something “simple”). It also upgrades the motors as well. So its pretty much almost an entire drivetrain upgrade.

The range degradation in extreme cold is not that much more than a gas car. And the range is more than adequate for their driving needs. Even more so since EVs don’t lose range while idling in city traffic like ICE cars do.

While the Teslas do not emit any greenhouse gases at present, the State Journal explains that Green Cab won’t see a net decrease in emissions as an immediate result of putting this fleet to work. Citing a study from the Union of Concerned Scientists, the paper explains that because Madison receives most of its power…

I think the problem is that you see the issue as one gas nozzle fits all, but an EV charger isn’t exactly same nozzle. Even same nozzle can be vastly different. Because each charger has their own specifications which offer their own advantages and disadvantages.

You say it is the wrong take, then proceed to repeat exactly what I said without realizing it.

Again, you are confused.

I would remind you the Volt got discontinued altogether and the Bolt is limited to charging at a pathetic 55kw for DC charging.

Even less talked about is Tesla’s destination charging network. It’s HUGE but gets overshadowed by the supercharger network.

Cause Tesla’s CEO actually drives his own EVs. How many executives drive their companies EV? To them its nothing more than a checkbox.

I honestly don’t think its a problem as long as there are adapters. The bigger issue is when a charging standard is mandated this early in the game, thus limiting advancement and progress.

And why not? The computing industry designed their own standards such as USB. What do you think will happen when that “independent” company design doesn’t fit your need?

Yes, and they will pick the worst standard, like they did in Europe.

It’s called the “innovators dilemma”. Manufacturers have too much tied down to ICE cars that they adopt things slowly. While companies like Tesla can go full speed ahead without worry. And this is precisely why huge companies in history ended up disappearing and replaced by the new guy despite being richer and etc.

Many questions were already answered but to be clear about something, you do not need a charging station. A NEMA outlet or dryer outlet would do. Charging stations just make it more convenient, but I would still suggest installing a NEMA outlet and get a charging station that plugs into the outlet instead of…

And knowing government they’ll pick the worst standard.

Tesla also has a HUGE destination charger network.

P100D just means Performance and Dual Motor with 100kwh battery.