Sign for what? It says precisely what I said, that autopilot is what is there now. Full self-driving is future update.

The Model S would have been able to keep up to a better extent if they actually used a modern Model S Raven (not even talking about Plaid). The Raven has MUCH better performance than the older Model S they used.

the one who started this was Porsche though, remember, “we aren’t using Model S as a benchmark”, gets caught using Model S as a benchmark.

Tesla’s demand comes from their technology, autopilot and self driving is just 1 piece of the technology pie.

Tesla does not call their system full self driving. The full self driving is the upcomming system. The current system is called autopilot which is different than the full self driving package.

Tesla has not been 16 years in business, for most of its life its been a temp name holding company. It only has been in business since 2008 and mass production since 2013.

Tesla Roadster is going to be king, the Model S is only a duke.

According to Autolist, value loss after 50k miles:

No, it is sad that the German TV show couldn’t even get a modern Tesla Model S raven and had to get an old one that is much slower to compare.

The Turbo S barely beat an old Model S, they didn’t even compare it against the newer Raven Model S model (let alone plaid coming next year).

Since when do NUMI workers know anything about eMMC? Not to mention the NUMI factory had a pretty bad reputation prior to it closing.

They plan to stick to just the batteries (what they should have done from day 1)

Here is the problem with Dyson, they bit more off than they can chew. They had 0 experience with both cars and batteries and decided to tackle both at the same time.

There is no nimble goal post, if you read carefully, I mentioned biodiesel in context to make it clear I did not want a reason involving environmental and etc but as CARS.

That’s because most “Reporters/bloggers”, have no clue what they are talking about. Many of these articles use “reserves” as a basis for their “theory”. But what they don’t realize is that reserves are only a matter of “confirmed reserves”, not “actual reserves”. So our reserves are actually much larger than the…

It’s not about committing to a single technology as it is to judge the feasibility of the technology and its long term potential. Hydrogen is simply a dead end. (Not only is the tech limited, the infrastructure around it would costs trillions upon trillions that would simply be wasted)

As for depletion aspect,…

The problem with that is simple, infrastructure and development. While diversification is nice, that is only the case if there is actual benefit in doing so. Hydrogen does not bring that benefit, actually the opposite.

I was clearly asking as CARS, you know advantages to consumers. The fact that you jumped to infrastructure instead speaks volume that there is none, they are worse than ICE in every single way.

1) If we are talking about just the cells, the Tesla Model 3 cells are 0.8892 MJ/kg (this has been independently tested)

I will note a few things: