because you think it's less-wrong to hit men, you're sexist. and violent.
because you think it's less-wrong to hit men, you're sexist. and violent.
because you think hitting people is ok, you're violent. because you think hitting only men is ok, you're sexist. it's not ok to hit anyone.
your character is sexist and violent.
you're sexist. and violent. you are the problem.
it's not ok to hit anyone. if you truly believe otherwise, you are the problem.
it is literally, yes, patriarchy that decided men should not hit women (as opposed to no one hitting anyone), it is a sexist teaching, imposed by the patriarchy, yes. you should stop telling anyone not to hit women, and begin telling everyone not to hit anyone.
if it was rooted in the "violence is wrong" ideal, you should've been taught not to hit anybody, not just not to hit women.
how'd that go?
but since it was upheld, and in 2008, no one is going to try to do anything about it until like 4 of them die.
the SCOTUS does not agree with you, they specifically said in 2008 that the first part of the sentence, about a militia, is not directly tied to the second part about individuals owning arms. i agree that it is insane, but they said it, and recently.
these shootings are the 2008 supreme court's fault. it's because of them that no one is going to try to do anything, not for decades. get used to seeing tiny body bags.
and republicans respond by voting in ever-more conservative, ever-more pro-gun, ever-more insane dickbags, digging in even more because they love guns more than anything, including children's lives.
i like it when it happens to other people and i can eavesdrop all flight without having to be the one avoiding eye contact or mumbling uncomfortable "uhm" and "yeah"s during the 3.5-hour story of the failure of the marriage of the dude behind and to the left of me.
no see, it's your MOM's fault. if it's not YOUR fault, we must find some OTHER woman to blame it on, so let's pin it on your mother.
most men do know rapists. they just don't know that they know them. although alot of times, they do kind-of know, but they don't talk about it or it wasn't rape-rape so it's not a big deal.
he is probably a rapist. sorrynotsorry. but the people who fight this the hardest, in my experience, have some shaaaaady incidents in their pasts.
the same information was always available, in newspapers or court records. the only difference is ease of access.
boo on the hair color. what's common sense about that? people's spirits will be crushed by conformity soon enough in the adult world. let the little ones have Manic Panic, please.
comparing that to any one of the abovementioned scenes perfectly elucidates the problem. compared to THAT, the wedding-night/grief-rape other rapes are completely sexualized and glamorized and titilating. that's the problem. the same guy who says "uh hey, i get it, broad, i'd fight to the death before i left myself…
so you agree that, at some point after being a rapist, jamie specifically, and some (but not all) other raping characters, the audience does indeed get to thinking of the character as "not a brutal, morally-challenged, reprehensible person?" because sometimes the character is a violent rapist and other times he is a…