thesporkgirl
thesporkgirl
thesporkgirl

incorrect. hand 2 wool items to a non-pothead, one owned by a pothead and one owned by a non-pothead and anyone who isn't desensitized to the smell will be able to identify the potheaded wool.

that's not put another way, it's a different question. and individual experiences are again, not the point, as was explained in this article. i enjoy my current female boss. i have enjoyed many male bosses. maybe if i had a completely gender-equal data pool, a judgment call could be made, but because women are

all things aren't equal. make them equal and then ask again.

at my work, a boyfriend asked a supervisor for time off for his girlfriend, to be kept secret from her. we granted it, of course, it was very sweet of him.

co-signed.

how can you respect him? don't marry someone whose core values you don't respect. and don't marry someone who doesn't respect yours.

the passive voice is also pretty telling. "_____ hit me" and "_____ molested me" put the focus where it belongs, instead of "i got hit" or "i was molested"

people don't cry at frustrating stuff all the time either. sometimes, you laugh and sometimes, people cry.

although it would be nice for traditionally-female emotions to be treated equally to traditionally-male emotions in the workplace, in the interim, i've found i can stop crying if i:

when male business execs shout, get red-faced and pound the table in anger, they are seen as tough and passionate. but one tear of frustration from a chick and it's the end of the goddamned capitalist system.

i did not intend to suggest that my theory was the only possible reason any person could ever dislike the term.

but the "why" in "why don't young women want to call themselves feminists" goes unanswered here. i think the word is important, because disliking the word is, in my opinion, a direct results of society and men loudly proclaiming their dislike of the word, and young women's not wanting to upset or challenge those

please tag this article with the "bad ideas" tag.

i guess i just have a lot of friends who date people i don't like/approve of, but i stay friends with them anyway. i don't really consider this any different from my friend who dates the pillhead or the one who chooses nothing but go-nowhere serial-cheating musicians. i am sad for their choices, i wish they were

i understand all that.

but putting equal (or more) blame on the accomplice is also a remnant of sexism, when people excused male infidelity as something outside the men's control, because men were animals with no rationality and every single woman on earth had to take up the responsibility to not allow him to "stray." because it's not the

the husband is the fool-maker and turd-maker.

the married person unquestionably has a higher standard of responsibility than the accomplice. the married person made a promise, and is choosing to break the promise, and is lying to their partner's face every day in order to maintain deceit. it's not ridiculous. it's ridiculous to not grasp the very simple fact: the

lots of my friends do things that are fucked up. because i'm friends with people. people aren't perfect.

"just as bad"?