It’s not like there are people clamoring for a Willy Wonka expanded universe.

I guess the mermaid is supposed to be singing, but she looks like she’s screaming into the void. From the bottom of the sea.

OK, hang on. Is this judge saying that if I’m in the US, any fucking rando on the street has the right to come up on me and have a “close, personal conversation”? And specifically that they can rock right up and get close and personal if they feel compelled to tell me that they don’t agree with how I’m behaving? That…

I was going to comment that “engaging in close, personal conversations” was never the goal, but you beat me to it. As you say, it’s all about being able to intimidate them with the threat of physical violence.

FTFY

And also see absolutely zero problems outlawing speech they don’t like (Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay law and the innumerable controls put around GOP conventions and the like).

Nonsense. The protesters will also be armed, will shoot back, and will now be able to murder them without repercussions. That’s 100% how I think it’d go. Most of the time, when a pregnant person is involved in a deadly incident, they’re the one who ends up bearing the legal responsibility for it -- regardless of who…

So if legal gun-carrying people feel threatened for their lives as a result of these anti-abortionists screaming things at them and mobbing them while they’re just trying to get health care, would they be off the hook for standing their ground and defending themselves?  Just asking a question. 

That’s already happened but they still side w/ the shooters even if the shooters go to jail ultimately. 

These are the same people who want to make it legal to run over protesters in the streets.