Kotaku has paid Geoff Keighley quite a bit for freelance work in the past, yet I see no mention of it here in this article where Kotaku claims some kind of superiority over this man who they contracted with. Does Kotaku treat all its former freelancers this way? Will Kotaku issue an apology for having worked with this…

I’m confused as to why people seem to think Keighley should be an activist. His shows are and have always been marketing shows. The only time he’s ever mentioned a publisher in a negative light was Konami and that was only after it essentially left the gaming industry and was no longer relevant.

Even though when you get older and see loved ones and those you were fans of pass, it’s still hard to take when you hear of it. I’ll be 62 in a couple of weeks, and it’s still hard.

This one fucking hurts. Like so fucking much. Dragonball is pretty much my childhood. It informed so much of my interests today. The idea that Akira Toriyama could die didn’t even cross my mind.

Good.

I’m so exhausted of late stage capitalism. When do we get to the part where we put CEOs and shareholders in a guillotine?

RIP Rocksteady. Cause of death AT&T+Zazloff+other idiots who don’t know how to run a game division.

Also, even if it WAS just “easy mode,” so what? When games have an outright, clearly-stated easy mode, so what? I would love for someone to give me a legitimate argument for how someone else playing a game on easy -- online games/multiplayer games notwithstanding, of course -- affects THEIR experience with/enjoyment…

I’m saying there should be editorial cohesion from a site pretending to be something other than a blog.

Funny how much of a deal this site made about Hogwarts player count dropping by much less than this after 6 months yet when its a game you don’t have a hate-on for it you say it doesn’t matter. You cant have it both ways.

This comment cracked me up, but now i’m realizing I don’t think I even saw the roller coaster one.

When’re they going to replace that antique of an engine?

BGS will be paving over cracks in the pavement but plans on ignoring the potholes as they’re a part of the game’s design. 

locking heroes behind a grind or cash was kind of the straw for me

Emily Blunt in Edge of Tomorrow is a physique that doesn’t scream steroids but also clearly communicates they are not to be fucked with. Linda Hamilton in Terminator 2 is another example. Its my opinion that these physiques are also still quite feminine for the people who get their panties in a twist over that kind of…

She just needs to look like she’s spent a significant portion of her life training to beat the ever-loving shit out of the man who killed her father. She doesn’t need to be huge, just in very, very good shape. It’s important for us to believe that she was obsessed, not that she was necessarily born with the bone…

Who is “everybody”? I’ve yet to see or hear ANY hands on when it comes to this game.

Honestly respectable of them - and it should be made the legal default. As it is though, it’d be nice if Marvel Heroes got similar treatment.

We’re all in public, and if you’re interesting enough to stare at, we gonna stare at you. Be less interesting.

So one person staring at you over your spouse’s shoulder is fine, but two is far too many.