theshamespearofhurt--disqus
The Shame-Spear of Hurt
theshamespearofhurt--disqus

Every time I watch it, it feels like when you're reading a book and suddenly realize you've been zoned out for a couple pages. "Should I go back? Nah, I'll just plow ahead." I've seen BR three times and while I absolutely adore the aesthetic, I can't really recall the actual movie. Feels like a dream that slipped away.

He has a weirdly microscopic part in 13 Reasons Why as well.

delete ur account

Lived in New York for awhile. I think the Joe's in Santa Monica on Broadway is great. Their grandma pie is very good.

doesn't stop morons from saying "ree-sees-pee-sees"

They negotiated the end-date towards the back end of season three, so Spring 2007.

Music publishing has everything to do with creating art. They're finding the writers outlets for their music, it is an entirely creative endeavor for getting music out into the world.

As opposed to here where comments from hours ago or minutes ago mix and mingle?

Compulsories are merely for a full cover. This is basically using portions of the track to create a new work, so the correct legal form of action would've been to give Ocasek a piece of publishing on the new work with his approval.

Not only is that 10-second snippet someone else's IP, a song they wrote, composed, recorded, but it's also a master that someone owns, typically the label. The artists are free to re-record that 10-second snippet themselves and merely work out songwriting splits on the newly created song with the original songwriters,

This isn't even sampling. If he recorded the guitar part on his own, he's technically free to do that, he just has to give the songwriter, in this case Ocasek, part of the publishing on the song. It's a clear process and I can't believe people in the music industry still fuck this up. Hip-hop records use uncleared

Thicke fucked up by admitting in an interview when the song came out that they were listening to the track in the studio or something like that. in copyright infringement cases like music one of the biggest things you have to prove is that the defendant is familiar with the original work. That right there was the

Yeah, but it's a really popular chord progression. You can't copyright chord progressions. Smith, I think, is in the clear.

It's not hard to copy Dead Poets Society then throw in a violent gag. That said, it was very, very funny.

Video player controls won't disappear. Unfortunate on a scene with subtitles.

You're doing God's work, son.

They don't give a fuck about details like that on this show, or really, many details all together.

"so unrealistic and forced for the plot to progress"

jesus god i hope not