Why do you believe prostitution is safe?

You keep bringing up worker exploitation at places like Amazon - yet you think when sex is being sold for profit suddenly capitalism is a coddling protector?

Normalizing prostitution and presenting it as a career women should pursue leads to the attitudes that allow women to be exploited. It tells readers to assume the women in brothels, in the red light districts, etc are all happy and not to question the brand of feminism that allows men to get rich off our “liberation.”

You need to read something besides vice and jezebel. 

Am I supposed to feel shamed because I care about the exploitation of women? You should feel shamed women are so low on your priority list.

I am vocal because I am disgusted the patriarchy is selling women this lie that allowing men unfettered access to their bodies is liberation and “good feminism.” Looking at…

I did not say all sex work is exploitation. Demand for sex work will ALWAYS lead to exploitation. 

This is so not close to anything I wrote or implied 

I think it’s a reasonable assumption that women who take money from men in exchange for sex - which men then feel entitled to receive - are at a greater risk of sexual assault than cashiers at kroger.

Similar to the logic claiming the reason more women aren’t prostitutes is because we live in such a puritanical, uptight society. Otherwise being alone and naked with someone stronger than you in an intimate position - for cash, often not very much cash -  would be endlessly appealing.

Ok guy on the internet 

Knowing what happens to women who are victims of sexual assault why do you believe prostitution could ever be safe?

Once again jezebel, third-wave rag, writes about sex worker by featuring white, well-paid, women. A woman who would have other economic options. Never the women in brothels who are billed for every tampon they use and leave more broken and (literally) broke than when they entered. Or the numerous places where sex work…

I’m saying pornography and violent video games and/or drug use on tv are not the same thing and can’t be lumped into the same category because mike pence or evangelicals or whatever want to ban both.

Are you seriously using bernie and hillary as your non-shitty-person examples? 

The woman who replaced him does all those things. Sorry she isn’t also fake-grabbing boobs and existing with a penis.

“Hit jobs” can’t be a thing if you’re not acting like a piece of shit to begin with.

Instead of repeating a reddit talking point you can read the many volumes of studies that have been done on the effects of exposure to graphic/violent pornography. 

I am aware of different treatments for pedophilia - moreso than the first google hit. The most beneficial so far has been to direct attractions towards adults as the majority of pedophiles have attraction to both. 

Except this is not what happens. I know it’s third-wave to pretend pornography is the cure of all societal ills - but exposure to virtual child pornography normalizes behavior and leads to exposure to real child pornography. 

What do they think the economic consequences are going to be when California burns to the ground?