Five royals, a movement leader, a social worker, and a group of protesters. Or, one late Classical, two Renaissance era, one 18th century, one 19th century, and two individuals and one group from the 20th. Or, two Asians, five Europeans, and a group of Latin Americans.

What a world this would be if it did. I can just see it now - "run squirrel, run!"

Good. Bury those bastards under a huge pile of fines and lawsuits. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of charlatans.

Where I live, parents were complaining about a textbook that described Puritans as religiously intolerant. Ignorance and petty-mindedness are rampant.

Anti-Christian? Gee, what does it say? Maybe that Christian missionaries took Amerindian children away from their parents to indoctrinate them and strip of their indigenous culture? Or maybe it failed to have that "Christ is great!" attitude?

Um, thanks for the vote of confidence. Yes it would be a stupid reason to block someone - however, you need to use a bit of imagination. Trying saying "Alicaida." (In this case the "ai" would be a single vowel sound.)

The authoritarian personality is drawn to these kinds of jobs. I imagine it's hard to screen between "I like to enforce rules" and "I like to enforce rules by using a good beatdown."

Reverse the two names, as it would read on a passport.

That kind of knee-jerk response is precisely why the Star Chamber nature of the no-fly list is a major croc. There's no effective way to appeal, no way to find out why you are on there. You could be on there because you turned down someone for the prom twenty years ago and they put you on the list for revenge. The…

Given that I have the least limber quads in the southeast, it ain't happening. But my shoulders are freaky limber. I need a partner who can do splits, and we can breed superheros.

Well, Scalia was referencing an opinion from 1896, after 3/5 had been negated by the 14th Amendment. And we all know what a wonderful racial paradise our legal system was back in 1896! Hmm, what famous 1896 decision could Scalia be talking about? Oh right - "Plessy v. Ferguson." The "Justice Harlan" he is referencing…

"We're not saying that she's stupid. We're just saying that she doesn't know any better isn't a white male. Maybe when she learns the way the world is supposed to work how to be a white male, we'll come to like her. But right now, she's just not experienced enough too not white male."

No, they are just there on a tourist visa. So every three months they take the bus to Portugal and enjoy a nice lunch and come home.

Yeah, but these are kind of guys who get real mad if you say that, regardless of truth.

There are no police on the internet, and sexual harassment has done more than just embarrass a few women. These guys have caused fantastic damage, and are not know to being open to reason. Holding their feet to the fire is perfectly appropriate in many cases.

Hahahaha. Yes, let's get all self-righteous about the hurt fee-fees of misogynistic creeps, the kinds of guys who make a lot of grief for a lot of women. Color me not concerned.

As I noted on a similar comment - you got hit people where it hurts sometimes. These are guys who are a little too wrapped up in their manliness for their own good. They are precisely the kind of folks you take down in this particular way.

You got hit people where it hurts sometimes. These are guys who are a little too wrapped up in their manliness for their own good. They are precisely the kind of folks you take down in this particular way.

Eh, it's Bear Grylls. Les Stroud is less annoying, more real. And yes, it's TV, so there are limits to the "real" thing. But he is way less annoying, for sure.

Maybe she was on vacation in Buffalo. Who knows?