So you are telling me that a 130K$ all-new platform and engine is faster than a 100K, 7 years old car?

Huh. that's surprising.

The GT-R was .6 seconds slower than its claimed 0-60 while the Porsche was easily capable of meeting its advertised time. Was the GT-R not functioning ideally or is it actually just slower than advertised? I want to see this battle again with a different GT-R.

I am seriously sick...absolutely SICK of comparing EVERYTHING under the sun with the f*cking Porsche 911.... Why is everything that is remotely sporty a "911 fighter". I am just absolutely sick. Been lurking here for ages, and this is the first time I actually post.

DADDY?!?!

they should call it the Fusion Jr.

I'm gonna tip my hat to the team behind the Camry. Because you know there's amazing design and engineering talent, probably unlimited resources (a budget that could fund dozens of boutique supercar makers, all rolled into 1 car), and the success of one of the world's largest carmakers riding on your shouders. And you…

I don't associate Buicks with millionaires, I associate them with old people.

We have had the Trax here in Canada for a year. Trust me, it's nothing to get excited about.

Most importantly, R U Hairy?

*Fixed your headline for you.

Two questions:

The San Francisco Smart Car owners got revenge

Design modeled after 2014 F1 car nose.

Let's do the math[1]:

Oh, come on. In before someone posts it:

Lighten up, Francis