*jaw drops* You are.  So fucking right.

Nice reference!

I would give this more stars because any mention of Good Omens is worth many stars.

Actually, it’s kind of the exact opposite--this shows how very difficult it is to convincingly fake an attack, and how easily the stories of people lying about being assaulted crumble under investigation. Nobody is sincerely equating “believe victims” with “don’t investigate crimes”; that’s a straw man used by rape…

“Believing the victim” means exactly what you just said: a crime has been reported, we will investigate it fully because we believe a crime has been committed, and we need to get to the bottom of it.” As facts emerge, sometimes, so does skepticism, but if you first reaction is to say, “well, he might have been making…

Donating those pizzas is the definition of charity because they easily could have gone in the garbage and helped no one. You did a good thing and that’s admirable.

Do you think Sia will give me partial credit for the 8 pizzas I dropped off at the local homeless shelter last night? We had a lot of bad orders last night, and I hate to throw away good food, so it wasn’t purely charitable.

I don’t believe it but would love to be proved wrong, and wouldn’t be surprised. Animals are bonkers. Our ex-backyard raccoon would viciously go after all the dogs in the neighborhood, but I’d allow her to chill on our windowsill and would blast the space heater on her during her winter visitation sessions. She NEVER w…

I am shocked how often I have seen that attitude in other businesses and it does often lead to disaster.

I’m pretty sure lying to get people’s money for goods/services you have no intention or ability to produce is pretty much the textbook definition of fraud.

Also, the last thing he says in his post is “I’ll never buy HTC products ever again, and I’ll never donate a cent to any Christian groups in Taiwan!”, referring to the anti-LGBTQ+ groups/donors he mentioned in his post. So idk, if you read the whole post it comes across more like an ally who’s trying but is using the…

I work at a not for profit that relies on a resale shop to fund most of our programs. We are absolutely fucking THRILLED about this.

I want Ayra to kill everyone and then she pulls off her face and she’s Sean Bean.

I take it that she did not go to the Kevin Hart School of apologising?

I think he’s ducking it because he’s not remorseful and is so completely entrenched in his position of not being okay with gay people he won’t even fake an apology.

What in the blue fuck is Jenny McCarthy doing there? And why would anyone in their right mind give attention to anything she’s a part of?

What’s even more ballsy is Stardock claims that Ford and Reiche never owned any copyright as they allegedly never made the original games themselves. I remember liking Stardock a whole lot a decade ago when they published Sins of a Solar Empire DRM-free, but this whole fustercluck has really turned my opinion around.

But that’s not the point, is it? Aside from numerous games playing similar to each without having to use each other’s brands, there’s been ongoing contention with how Stardock even got the Star Control IP. If they wanted to avoid all this, they could’ve just forged ahead without the already in question “Star Control”…

Hi Jezzies,

Just... ask.