She had the nerve to blame not anyone, but specifically brown skinned people i.e. refugees. That’s not a ‘silly girl’ attitude.

Susan Sarandon - no, just no. There is an age for this and it has passed. Picture a 69 yo dude in skinny jeans and a muscle shirt. Eewww.

No, the victims deserve to know that he is in prison. They do not have the right to know where exactly, just like they don’t need to know about the prison’s menu plan for next week. There is no ‘putting on the big boy drawers’. If he isn’t kept away from gen pop, he will be killed bc he is a former cop, it’s as simple…

The guy will be in prison for life (263 years), probably seperated from gen pop in total isolation. That’s not punishment enough for you? Next time you read about a cute blonde teacher committing statutory rape getting a slap on the wrist while you probably believe that to be *problematic* at best, you should rethink…

The lady doth protest too much!

You’re right. The women who marry men for their money don’t see them as the trophy, the trophy is the money. That’s the difference, but equally cynical as seeing a person as some kind of prize.

based on my intellect/job/demanding personality

You do realize, that there could never be a reverse King Of Queens, with a hot dude and a conventionally less attractive woman, don’t you? Not because there couldn’t be such a combination in real life, but the sheer amount of fat jokes that the guy had to endure in KOQ would be unthinkable. Every other joke was about…

I wonder what you would say, if a father told his son, “If you’re going to settle, at least settle with a beautiful girl so that you have a trophy to show for.” Pretty cynical, isn’t it?

I’d say, that happens the day after JLo or Madonna start dating guys their age, to cite just the most famous examples of famous women in showbiz who show the same traits as men. It’s a if rich/famous/attractive people have a penchant for mating with other rich/famous/ attractive people. It’s almost a miracle!

Men put a much bigger premium on a “pleasing disposition” in a mate as compared to women—according to Forbes

*If* the Republicans still control congress then. That’s a big if, considering that any Republican president (Trump, Cruz, Rubio etc) would be seen as an extremist. Here are the results of any midterm elections since Eisenhower, with regards to the win/loss for the president’s party. The party of the sitting president…

So you’re saying that a Democrat in the WH would be practically powerless against the stalemate in congress but a Republican president could run roughshot over the constitution and congress, even though he is bound by the very same constitutional restrictions as any president before him? What you don’t see is the fact…

First of all, ist that an argument *for* Hillary Clinton? if so, point me to the source that shows her to being in favor of reparations. Reparations are just not feasible and you know it! They would either be symbolic for 40 million people or it would be economically harmful for the whole country. Oh, what about…

Every progress always starts with a first step and someone saying OK, let’s do this.

Is that a rhetorical question? If not, here’s why upholding the status quo by not challenging the system might not be such a plum idea (according to almost every article on any Gawker media blog):

So, she chokes at the US Open in the semis playing a nobody and loses to a heavy underdog at the Australian Open and in between she wins ‘SI sportsperson of the year’. I wonder what a guy like Usain Bolt with his 3 gold medals from the 2015 IAAF world championship would have to say about that!

Clinton doesn’t know how to work the system, she personifies the system, as in fitting effortless into it, while giving the perception that she would fight for the average citizen’s wellbeing, when she’s only interested in upholding the status quo. I’d pick the guy with the great ideas who might win over the public…

“while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable, proposals in both areas.”