thereisnofluffy
ThereIsNoFluffy
thereisnofluffy

It’s not that it’s off topic necessarily, just, what does that add at all to the convo other than bragging? a good 40% of hetero women aren’t satisfied and you’re *shocked*!!?!? Really, that’s shocking to you? Come on... The disbelief is just to show what a good guy you are, how you would never be that guy. It’s

It’s like those “my wedding cost $3 and a box of Cracker Jacks” stories but even BETTER because nothing is better than a guy proclaiming how he’s satisfying ALL the ladies.

Over/under on number of comments in this thread being men humblebragging about how much they make their ladies orgasm and expressing disbelief that other men don’t?

No, what I’m saying is that because expenses are typically higher in areas where incomes are higher, you can’t define someone as “rich” based on an absolute number. If I lived in the Sudan and made $200K a year I’d be able to buy a lot more things than if I lived in Norway making that same amount. The ultimate value

Not to mention that if these assholes are supposed to be proof of the supremacy of whites...they reeeealllly need to present some more convincing evidence.

My father was an ex-Marine (although he always said there’s no such thing as an ex-Marine) and a hard-right conservative who thought the (TV show) Waltons were a bunch of communists, but he absolutely HATED Nazis. I can only imagine the fights he’d be starting over this crap.  

Embarrassing but true story, made less so by the fact that I was on much, many pain killers. Keanu and I both had spinal surgeries on the same day. I sent him a note asking if he wanted to neck.

Lol. I have not seen that gif before. That looks like the Graham Norton show, and I’m gonna go find that clip right now.

Please let “Good Dogs Of Famous World Leaders” be a running thing.

Absolutely. It is state and local governments who will be standing in the way of enforcement of some of these bad laws. The immigration enforcement is a prime example. We do not currently have enough ICE agents to round up everyone Trump wants to so the new guidelines say that local law enforcement can be deputized to

PREACH IT PREACH IT AND NEVER STOP:

“Democrat governors do matter and ours is the perfect example of why voting for a not-perfect prog (Terry is very much like Clinton) is vital for keeping innocent people’s rights intact.”

Any would be voter that looks at a moderate Democrat and a far right Republican and decides

But in 2016 she wasn’t substantially to the right of the electorate on gay marriage. Neither was she when she was in the Senate. Go look at the link I provided. Over the course of the last 20 years a lot of people have changed their opinion on that issue. That’s why gay marriage has gone from being majority

No precious, she’s not “flawed” she’s a grown-up - with a substantially complex and stressful job, the likes of which you could not possibly imagine, much less survive.

Yeah maybe someday there will be a flawless candidate, and we can all ride our own personal unicorn to the polls. Or maybe someday you will grow the fuck up. I wonder which will come first?

Clinton wasn’t substantially to the right of the electorate though. You brought up single payer as an example in which the majority of the electorate is to the left of Democrats/Clinton, since polling has indicated a majority of Americans support universal health coverage. But that polling indicates that: (1)

And yet the reality is that single payer is simply a non-starter in Congress. A presidential candidate can think it’s a great idea all she wants, but if it’s not going to actually get passed, that’s moot. Also whether Americans actually support any particular type of universal health care coverage is heavily

Clinton was not “substantially to the right of the electorate.”