Coward.

The equal and opposite reaction experiment. The one that proves the formula I provided. The one Newton did when he discovered the 3rd law in the first place. There are ample examples you can find online, and it's a easy experiment to do. It's probably the only way you're going to get an intuitive understanding of the…

Oh, well in that case you’re not making a semantic argument, you’re just wrong. The law is bullshit because it forces the IP holder to protect their IPs in ways that seem petty and meaningless from the outside, but are literally required of them if they want a hope of protecting their IP from an actual threat at a…

Well, if you want an explanation of why things move in opposite directions, then here you go. The math works, and math doesn't lie. It's not true because Newton said so; it's true because it's been rigorously tested and measured for hundreds of years and found to be true. Do the experiment yourself if you don't…

Unfortunately you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how physics works. It’s been proven experimentally and theoretically for thousands of years at this point, so if you don’t believe my explanation works then all I can tell you is that you need to take a high school physics class, because you don’t have the basic…

Your logic is a paradox of infinite regression. If they gas needs some other entity to push off of to exert force, then what does that other entity push off of? And what does that entity push off of? Where does the chain end?

The air is pressurized and held within the propulsion system. That's where the combustion happens. The expanded gas is then vented outward, which creates the thrust.

That’s not being pedantic, the law is bullshit but somehow them virtually being forced to follow it to protect their IP isn’t?

The reciprocal force is generated by the gas itself. It is the thing being pushed off of. Let me give you a better analogy:

The push back comes from the propellant. It’s being pushed out through the thruster, and that push is what moves the propelling body in the opposite direction. You appear to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Newton’s 3rd law. The propulsion system is exerting a force on the propellant, and by Newton’s third law…

It’s not a vacuum inside the propulsion system. The propellant is pressurized. Small thrusters like the one on the EVA suit don't even require combustion. They just force pressurized gas out through directed thrusters. The force of the gas being propelled out in one direction pushes the astronaut in the opposite…

The air is in the propulsion system (until it's forced out, which generates the propelling force).

It's pretty simple. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Forcing propellant out in one direction is the initial action, resulting in the thruster being pushed in the opposite direction (the reaction).

Incorrect. These kind of propulsion systems are exactly how astronauts pilot themselves around during EVAs involving this thing:

Don't you mean "makes clearer the meaning?"

Except that literally doesn't work on over half the enemies in the game. Sounds like you gave up before you learned to play.

Now you’re just being pedantic. If you don’t have any further point to make, then quit the semantic arguments and just cut your losses.

You can paint the same old room a million different colors, but it's still the same room.

That's just it. You haven't been interested in the previous ones, so you're not suffering from the franchise fatigue that people are feeling for this one.

I think fatigue for the series has just reached a tipping point. Not enough innovation in terms of gameplay mechanics or narrative. The whole genre has been evolving in smaller and smaller increments each year. I have a feeling we'll see something similar with the Assassin's Creed series soon if they don't seriously…