This is why I clicked the article as well. I want Galactic Conquest so bad.

Oh man, I literally clicked this article to express the same thing. I would buy Battlefront II and all content that can be used in Galaxy Conquest immediately if they added that.

Is this a sign that we may get Galactic Conquest in the future? Cause that is really all i ever wanted. It was all i ever played in the original Battlefront II.

I really, really wished I lived in a society where someone could say “I’m a conservative” and I wouldn’t have to recoil; we could have a healthy debate (or just agree to disagree!) about things like taxation/spending and government reach.

again confirming that conservatives literally only have two jokes. 1. haha triggered and 2. DAE attack helicopter le gender?!?

The same thing we saw with Deliverance (though the creators were racists and neo-nazis from the start), the same thing we see with a bunch of games that come out hailing this age.

Bloodstained ignores the modern conventions of these games, as well as their conveniences, like swift, speedy movement and the ability to strike in directions other than right in front of you. Their absence makes Bloodstained feel like Symphony of the Night, but also reminds you that Symphony of the Night is 24 years…

The Guardians ride is 10 times better than ToT. The theming is more interesting, the music is 100 times better, and the ride itself is more exciting, with more buck wild ups and downs. Oh, and the intro scene is superior, too.

Because someone appearing in an annoying movie is not a reliable measure of their ability to be a good partner.

So that guy dedicated a year of his life forming a fake friendship in order to get back at the guy who . . . spoiled a movie?

Just a quick reminder to everyone who was going around saying that the story had to play out the way it did because of reasons:

If you knew the game, you’d know they did not need an ancestor, and specifically did not get the blood from an ancestor in this game.

On the flip side, why make a part of the game choosing who you can romance if you’re only going to add DLC later that says “Nah, fuck that. This is who really mattered”? Regardless of whether your character was gay or straight, it seems like a really stupid choice.

That’s fine, but in this particular case Ubisoft earlier was making fuzz about how inclusive the game is.

Sweet Christ, the sheer volume of homophobic responses to this post.

Just because *you* don’t see it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. That’s what privilege is. We’ve all got our blindspots. I take things like this as an opportunity to learn, not an opportunity to get offended at others being offended about something I don’t yet fully understand.

I’m going to have to disagree with you, here. “You’ll grow out of it” is a pretty common sentiment that LGBT people face, right there with “it’s just a phase” and “you’re just experimenting.”

If the point was to continue the bloodline through your character (which is not even necessary in any case), then why not let us have babies with whatever NPC we chose to bang? Even if you take out the complete erasure of homosexuality and varying gender identities, it’s incredibly odd to throw in this random-ass NPC…