I'm pretty sure you'd lose the lawsuit SOE would throw at you.

... What possible reason do these companies have to limit who sees their trailers?

Considering that Avengers 2 seems to revolve around Tony Stark creating his own, private version of SHIELD, I would expect/ hope that season 2 will revolve around that. RDJ appearing is very unlikely, but I'm expecting the season overall to build up his new Avengers in some way or form.

They can still reference big events in previous movies. For instance, Avengers referenced events from Captain America (the Tesseract) and Thor (Loki). I actually saw Avengers before seeing every movie besides Iron Man, and I was able to understand it well enough.

Well, I don't know about how much they're planning. I did read an interview with Kevin Fiege saying he was throwing around the basic plot/ twist for Winter Soldier during the filming of Avengers (he actually told Chris Evans the plan the same day they filmed the sending Thor/Loki to Asgard scene in the park), so that…

So Tony's the one who makes Ultron after all. Makes sense, since robotics is his forte and all. And it does fit with the story. And I have no connection to Hank Pym making him, so yeah :p

Well, I don't know about Hitler. But I believe it was Mussolini's daughter who a lot of people were saying should sterilize herself. Which I think is kind of creepy, really. Forcing an innocent girl to forgo her biological right in order to purge the world of undesirable blood? Yeah, that doesn't really sound right…

Now we just need Movies: The Video Game!

True, but those aren't typically made by big studios and big, blockbuster names.

... Is there really anything that could possibly top duck on woman bestiality?

I never watched it aside from the clips in the NC review, but that does sound cool. Especially the ending. It would probably make Shamalyan a hell of a lot happier, too.

This world has officially just jumped the shark for me.

... Da fuck? ... How...? They better pay back everyone's hotel + plane tickets... if not, would this be a legimate case of a lawsuit?

Personally, I feel that the ending twists kind of ruined it. I mean, it could have been good by itself, but tacked on to the end of the medieval story it just felt out of place.

I heard Edward James Olmos once said that the mistake was calling it BattleStar Galactica, as that gave it an overly geeky tone. I think that's a pretty accurate explanation- it just sounds like it's a dumb campy sci-fi. In fact, he wouldn't even read the script at first because he assumed it would be generic sci fi…

Because it's not done. Thus, people will complain over playing a game that isn't done that is marked as a full retail release, which gives them bad press, which can be hard to shake off.

But if Crytek goes under, then I highly doubt whoever buys the liscence will be as forgiving. Though that is mostly because they would probably want to make use of their new purchase so you might get a new official game, so eh

Would any of the people behind those games still be there, though? I honestly don't think that's the case.

Yeah, I honestly can't see Crytek surviving this.

This is just plain, unadulterated cash grab territory now.