Is anyone else bugged when people link to YouTube for fan theories? There's no way in hell I'm listening to some random person yammer on about some theory that someone else came up with years ago.
Is anyone else bugged when people link to YouTube for fan theories? There's no way in hell I'm listening to some random person yammer on about some theory that someone else came up with years ago.
They can't mirror the images because then it would make it confusing during Hitler's duel with Stalin where he reveals that he's not left-handed.
I stopped watching the show after the third season or so only to discover that it was still on years later when the finale was on. I remember being impressed by the whole "run for president" speech as a way to end the show at the time but I can see why some people think it didn't make sense. I guess it still works…
iZombie is all about filling TV show voids. It's Veronica Mars and Pushing Daisies and Dollhouse!
Do you not trust me to open all the new articles in new tabs before reading, AV Club?
Oh, sure. Luke was totally signalling Vader to kill the Emperor by flopping on the ground helplessly in pain. You sound like an apologist for militarized Sith law enforcement tactics. What we really need is oversight of Imperial Force Taser brutality. And then we'll be ready to talk about Darth Vader's illegal…
It's a wretched hive full of scum and villainy and losers, but we're pullin' out of here to Windu.
This is a site that frequently posts a "TV Review" of a single TV premiere episode followed by a "TV Club" review of the same episode with no apparent coordination between the writers.
Edwin Starr is going to feel totally left out on a technicality, and he had such a good contribution…
Yes, I love that fact even though I could never figure out the implications. Did Lucas think Wookiee Jedi were too silly for his super-serious saga featuring frog-men battling robots and teddy bears defeating Space Nazis? Or is it like prejudice against black quarterbacks in the NFL? Is George Lucas racist against…
I think this argument was doomed from the start because you can't defend the prequels as a whole with one thesis. They're each terrible in different ways. And this article is being generous to examine the ideas behind the prequel storylines without the requisite regard for how they fail to communicate them properly…
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Mainly unicorns. Like, tons of unicorns. Unicorns everywhere. Do you get the message yet, audience?"
I'm pretty sure Nintendo has discovered all of our notebook scribblings from middle school and is putting them into games.
You'd butter believe it.
The director's cut still has some problems, mainly the focus on Orlando Bloom's boring stuff and the heavy-handed 2000s "why does religion make us fight endlessly" message.
Sideshow Bob is gonna rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake, rake…
A Perfect Vajayjay For Banana-Fist
Wait, Polygon is referencing David Foster Wallace in their review and Gameological isn't? What is this world coming to?
'BEST BEARD IN FOOTBALL'? Don't tell me some Johnny-come-lately Harvard man has a better beard than our lord and savior Nick Mangold.
Isn't 'strangely enough' redundant in a sentence with 'Steve Buscemi'?