theodorexxfrostxxmca
Theodore_Frost
theodorexxfrostxxmca

Thanks for this. People don’t understand how NDA’s work, but if Fisher has an NDA that prevents him from sharing details, then he has absolutely already violated that NDA by sharing what he has so far.

I’ll stick with the version of Cyborg in Doom Patrol. Thanks.

So you feel it was verbal abuse, you feel that Fisher is angry about verbal abuse due to Snyder, and you feel verbal abuse is sufficient grounds for this bizarre circus he’s running?

I mean yeah there were a minority of assholes mocking Snyder for his daughter’s death. But they were just that, a minority. Hell, I’ve been a pretty vocal critic of Snyder’s work and even I strongly do not condone this behavior. Hell, Moviebob was also nothing but supportive of Snyder at when he was going though that

I never once whined about fisher being vague. I’m saying that this sentence is idiotic in that it’s implicitly criticizing momoa for taking a long time to step in to support fisher, when none of us are in any position to say whether or not that support is justified.

You would have to go out of your way to see them and I doubt the “far more” section, but what does this have to do with the present article?

I never saw a SINGLE person make fun of Snyder’s daughter’s suicide.  In fact, the sympathy towards him was downright universal, despite people not liking his movies, because your daughter killing herself is fucking horrifying.

IIRC (and, granted, not a legal expert) NDAs are void if they’re being used to try and conceal illegal / unethical conduct, though, which is what Fisher has been heavily implying has been going on.

What a weird thing to say after a public figure publicly tweets something without details. 

But what was the “abuse” in question? He has not made any specific accusations of what Whedon or Johns have done. He has been drawing this out with vague accusations and not once specifying what action Johns and Whedon took that he considered abusive. I would be more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt if he

Fisher likes to imagine the studio is waging a war on him, when in public at least, the studio literally left him alone right up until Fisher tried to drag Walter Hamada into this mess (an executive who had literally no involment in whatever happened in DC). So the smear campaign Fisher thinks is being run, is really

Zero allegations other than “Whedon was a jerk”.

It’s easy for Whedon to shrug off all the Fisher attacks, because there isn’t any specificity, whatsoever.

If Fisher wanted to grind that axe, effectively, then he needed to supply some specifics. Specifics that could have been backed up by his co-stars with vague “I

Fuck that! I was to see his version of The Beaver!

Infantilizing Sam Barsanti doesn’t make you a fucking incel. He fully deserves it.

Well I would think Mr. Fisher MADE it our business with all the public twittering about it.

Jason Momoa shares message of support for Justice League co-star Ray Fisher

No no, little sam. It’s more surprising that it happened at all, because no one knows what fisher is venting about. Don’t worry, you keep trying and you’ll be a real writer one day!

I stand against [details to follow]!

WB is Wbeing disgusting.”

I worked for a corporate company that had a corporate parent once