thenamingoftheschro
The Naming of the Schrö
thenamingoftheschro

No one seems to remember this, but Obama actually won Indiana in 2008, just four years after it had gone for Bush by over 20 points. A state in which a fifth of the eligible population had been in the KKK also gave its votes to a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama. Just a weird, weird, state.

Almost certainly the reason he doesn’t remember that shooting is that at this point it seems like a drop in an ocean of shootings.

And without the Affordable Care Act, insurance would be even more expensive than it is right now.

The repeal of the individual mandate doesn’t go into effect until 2019. Entirely possible that person really was fined by the IRS.

Stop describing girls you had crushes on in middle-school or earlier as “hot.” If she’s prepubescent, this isn’t something to mess with. 

Yeah, the guy has to be in a coma or something. 

The Tuck Rule no longer exists, though.

One party consistently has 90% of its caucus voting the correct way, the other party consistently has 0% of its caucus voting the correct way.

Here’s the better way to think about this. 17 Democrats out of 197 haven’t signed. 238 out of 238 Republicans haven’t signed.

Over 91% of House Democrats have signed this. Exactly 0% of House Republicans have signed this. Hell of a “both parties” comparison to make.

There are only 197 Democrats in the House right now (the new Congress of 235 Democrats doesn’t get sworn until January 3rd). Of those 197 total Dems, 180 have already signed it. That means over 91% of House Democrats have signed.

Harsh tone, sure, but quite frankly, anyone who thinks an asshole who willingly chose *Mike Pence* to be running mate actually cares about gay people is stupid.

So, this post seems at odds with this tweet.

You see that crowd of 73,000+ going wild? Eat a bag of rancid cat turds, bitch.

Fuck you and eat shit, Gabe.

I see your 1Q84 reference and raise you this “The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle” passage:

No one even got a racquet on a serve?

But this question isn’t asking if you could win a match or even a game in a set against him; it’s asking if, given 72 chances, he couldn’t miss even a single shot and you could make any contact at all with even just one shot he hits. You wouldn’t even have to get it back in play; you’d win the competition against him