themoose-old1
The_Moose
themoose-old1

@sooper_gizmo12: You do know that belying the all marketing hype tricking people into buying active shutter glasses they are technically the most advanced... The other technologies reduce picture quality and resolution...

@Kaiser-Machead v.2.2: When I quit there was pleading ex-girlfriend-esque message saying that if I wanted to sign back in they'd keep all my stuff for me if I ever wanted to come back to her.

So you can simply hit a button to download anything you've put on there before?

@NVJar: It has no atomic interaction in three dimensions, meaning that from the atoms' point of view they exist in only a two dimensional plane.

@shkm: Not sure how you're currently doing it but cracking an egg on a hard flat surface has saved me from destroying them. I used to use hard edges and it made it much harder to keep the thing intact.

@PsyberS: Actually this turns into a ridiculous debate if you want to argue flawed logic.

@Blackti3: When the stream is at it's peak I would tend to agree with you. It's the first 20 minutes when the tech they're using is sending you barely above standard def feeds so it can buffer quick enough with it's variable bit-rate that I'd argue makes the experience shitty.

@Blackti3: You do know some people prefer the extra quality that blu-ray's provide over streaming services.

@levi4884: So your biggest complaints are that their OS is outdated... read anything about the latest update to that? Sounds like all your voiced gripes are about to be solved there man.

@aeiluindae: Canada is a very large place, but there are services here that are trumping a lot of other countries.

@Despite1992: Screw Google's slow implementation. Shaw is already running trial markets with it installed in some Canadian cities.

@SkipErnst: Studying photogrammetry and 3D imaging during my university days I can tell you that the glasses-less 3D they're releasing is going to have incredible limitations compared to the current setups. Not saying you should buy now if you aren't impressed (I'm waiting for prices to drop dramatically and for more

@Charliehorse: I believe the psychological barrier you're describing is something we'll get used to rather quickly. I do a lot of stereoscopic imaging analysis for my career and barely see an issue with this. In my mind it would be the same as arguing that television itself would never take off because we have to add

@PenitentPenguin: And I'd argue that you are indeed "one of these people." And I believe I may be as well, so I've stopped making assumptions based as such.

@dmbfan33: As someone that is addicted to both gadgets function as well as their form I completely disagree with your case solution.

@Live_free: Anecdotal evidence is a pretty weak way to argue a point.

@Bant: Electric Burger: Methinks you may have misread. The plastic screen would go under a glass sheet, it just wouldn't be integrated into it so that when the glass breaks you could just replace a relatively cheap piece of glass instead of an OLED screen.