thekromb
Kevin
thekromb

But the party is in SF. You have it backwards; Santa Clara is getting virtually no tourism dollars for this. people will drive or take the train to the event; see it, then leave. But SF has been dealing with a large influx of tourists for two weeks. It’s awesome. I love this city.

The GAME will be played in Santa Clara, because that’s where the stadium is. The bulk of the event’s impact, though, is in San Francisco, because nobody wants to spend any more time in Santa Clara than is absolutely necessary— so all the corporate boosterism baloney is happening in San Francisco.

Don’t forget to mention that this is all being pushed on the residents of a city that isn’t even home to the actual Super Bowl. The SF politicians sold the city at no cost to the NFL and all costs to the city.

Reading the demands the city of Minneapolis allowed the NFL to get away with, there isn’t *one* of those that didn’t sound plausible.

And to think that this is merely the first of two interviews the Cowboys require before signing a player.

I know this doesn’t really have anything to do with the Dem debate tonight. But, I happened across this while reading this article, and was just too good to not share.

false.. my dash cam has parking mode, which enables the cam to go into a stand by / power saving mode until it detects motion, at which point it records

They will if you wire it directly to the battery, with the right model. Some will start if the car is hit

Many have vibration snesors which will go off if the car is disturbed.

Is it too much to ask to know how it works? Or is that outside the scope of this tech-related (or was it climate change? politics?) website

Yes, as indicated this is called FORESHADOWING, not spoilers.

huh? mine’s definitely an Intel Mac

How horribly rude of me, thinking that I had a fucking right to engage in the political processes of this country. Must have missed that day of civics where they went over how we're obligated to go with the safest choice, lest we be kicked out.

Can we knock it the fuck off with the ‘Sander’s supporters are naïve and think he’s magic socialist Santa Claus who will enact his entire platform with a wave of his magic wand’ narrative? Seriously. Like, we fucking understand political reality. We know that a good portion of Sander’s platform is going to be

Potatoes no nutritional value?

I think the key word there is always. The people I know who take issue with Hillary Clinton’s opinion changing take issue with the frequency to which she does it. Throughout her political tenure she has changed her opinion on pretty much every major issue while Bernie has changed his on one, and even then it’s not a

I think Bernie’s stance on guns fits the middleground opinion of Americans: Even Republicans want sensible gun laws. The NRA holds everyone hostage. Their rhetoric—their ability to keep firearms less regulated than fireworks—stands in the face of the 80+% of Americans who understand that reasonable regulation can and

I’ve never understood people who cite a politician’s response to public opinion as a flaw.

Yeah, much like pretty much all coverage not online is devoted to Hillary, as well.

Some may bray with the “flip flop” trope - personally, I WANT a candidate with the courage and mental capacity to refine and revise legislation, unlike the ubiquitous adherents to dogma.