That’s strange. Was your point that Clinton has said exponentially worse things and you didn’t make a peep about them?
My point is “support your candidate, don’t denigrate the other” also means, for me, don’t shit on people who support “the other” candidate. Making sweeping generalizations based on your Facebook feed isn’t helpful. I have the exact opposite anecdotal experience, but I’m not up and down this thread talking about how… Read more
Two threads up, you’re making sweeping generalizations about how “Bernsters” are aggressive and off-putting. Maaaaaybe that’s not so much helping in this respect.
Is it really such an indictment? Maybe the video just helps reinforce the concept. Maybe people just like slow motion videos.
Your lack of a Timbuk2 entry disturbs me.
Most unique !?!? Anyone with any lernin know it’s uniquest.
I see someone had a dictionary for breakfast.
Watch “The Big Short” and you will change your tune.
Especially since, y’know, not all of America lives in NYC or rides the subway. Contrary to what Gawker and so many other media employees may sometimes think.
I think you kind of buried the lede on this. The president does not need to ride the subway. The president should have some concept of how they would execute their campaign promises.
She was for subway tokens before she was against them.
They tried, but they had a hard time finding translators.
You make a good point. However, dramatic change over a short period of time is bad for business (think about the farming industry) and bad for life that can’t evolve as fast as us.
May I suggest an eager applicant who gives a dam about this?