thekeith82
thekeith82
thekeith82

Excellent. We’ve conditioned you to hate millions of people you’ve never met, pre-judged on the behaviour of a subset of them, most of whom you’ve also never met but have read about on the internet (e.g. this article). All we need to do now is turn that tendency towards prejudice in a racial direction. I see you later

Disagree again - POC (male) nerds are some of the most virulent misogynists and racists.

Excuse me, but the most powerful figure in chess is a woman, and calling her a lunatic is a typical patriarchy response to a strong woman.

A different person, a neuroscientist (James Fallon) has apparently said that there is indeed a difference between a psychopath and sociopath.

Psychology doesn’t completely agree on ‘sociopath’ vs. ‘psychopath’. Different organizations will all come to a different consensus. Most argue that they are the same thing and that sociopath is an outdated term as the article has indicated. There are a few groups, or sometimes individuals, who would argue that there

Jon’s views aren’t based on real statistics, but from Breitbart bullshit. He argued that the most well off black person is still more violent and more likely to commit crimes than the worst off whites. Please don’t let him half-assedly backpedal from such a blatantly racist (and factually incorrect) statement.

I asked the question to get around generalities and strike at the meat of the matter. No more, no less.

Again, if you completely mischaracterize someone’s argument, you’re not going to best them. At best you’re going to beat a phantom that you created.

Meh, if someone is going to ask me to argue for the validity of my identity/existence, I’m not going to bother. It isn’t up for debate: who I am is who I am. Someone wants to say, “I disagree?” Great. That’s super interesting! Please tell me more! ::wanders off::

Gender identity is a fundamental part of most people’s personality. Arguing that people shouldn’t be able to express that, is in effect arguing that they shouldn’t exist.

Some folks just don’t believe that the he has become a she, so they continue to call them a he.

Jim Sterling did on the basis of their YouTube fair-use policy. Since they use extremely loose definitions of fair use in copyright law on YouTube videos, that supposedly makes it fair for you to use extremely loose definitions of piracy to download their games. While their copyright claim policy is pretty crappy,

Ya i almost hate people saying Jim “won” the lawsuit because it implies that Romine’s claim was ever seriously entertained. This got two hilarious pleadings and wasnt going any further no matter what.

There was no chance this was ever going to get anywhere

Jim on Jim violence

The really surprising thing to me about the Seinfeld complaint was that he’s playing colleges at all, he’s not an comic who’s moved with the times, and the current college audience aren’t going to have much nostalgia for his stuff either.

Jesus Christ, Don’t start with that bullshit, please. We’re not talking about real-world armor, are we? The in-game models are clearly identifiable as male and female without being even remotely sexualized. I don’t want “giant plates for their tits”, your words btw, just figures that fairly represent the game.

Point being, when in recent history did CONCEIT become interchangeable with CONCEPT? More and more throughout life recently I have seen this word appear over and over, and it sounds so wrong to my brain. The former, Conceit, I have predominantly understood my entire life to mean, “excessive pride in oneself,” and the

I’m not sure why you would Google enough to be able to discuss the word without Googling enough to learn that the way it was used here is a correct usage.