thehilblog
thehil
thehilblog

As long as I can look at Ruth Negga he can talk as long as he wants.

While you are technically correct (the best kind of correct!), subsequent seasons seems to bear out the analysis you’re responding to.

I don’t think you’re quite getting it.

Exactly. The GOP’s entire reason for existing at this point is to help wealthy people hold and grow their wealth. That’s it. Everything else, literally everything else is there as window dressing, to distract the stupid poor people and keep them voting against their own interests.

Honestly I feel bad for the kids in her care, clearly they would be better served by almost literally anyone else.

I disagreed with the intensity of your hostility to Mayor Pete (he’s not one of my top three candidates, but I feel like he has a valuable role to play in the future of the Democratic party and would rather avoid the classic progressive tendency to throw stones at every Democrat who exists.)

Missing from this piece is Biden’s last big major legislative “achievement” in the Senate: passing the Bankruptcy bill in 2005, which he fine-tuned to benefit banks over consumers - just in time to exacerbate the misery when the economy collapsed in 2008. (Elizabeth Warren, incidentally, spoke out vociferously against

Not gonna lie - this is so unexpected for the area that I cried when I saw it yesterday. Yes, Nashville is slightly more left than the other parts of the state, but it’s still full of rednecks within the city limits. This is the last kind of story that I ever expected to see and it was amazing.

There’s no way she qualifies for the third debate. The polling qualifications will weed her out.

Which will be a blessing, because I can feel my brain leak out my ear once she starts talking. That thousand mile stare drops IQ points even with the sound and captions turned off.

Welcome to my haterade party. Who listened to Jill Stein and thought “We need this in the Democratic primary, but with no plans, even less qualifications, and more tinfoil”?

No, her response really wasn’t that good. She’s a complete joke of a candidate. She’s not automatically a “progressive” to cheer for just because of her position on reparations, when she breaks the cardinal rule around taking PAC money and big dollar fundraisers and makes the kind of comments on weight and depression

I’m pretty disappointed in Stephen for giving this flake airtime. I’m also pretty disappointed in this country because she qualified for a second debate after her “I’ll beat Trump with love” crystal waiving bs.

We really are a joke.

Im truly sorry almost everyone in this comment section failed to see your point. They just see “Oh, it’s that scientist guy! surely what he is saying is important and relevant!”

You know what would help that? Holding men who sexually harass women accountable.

There’s no such thing as “stick to sports” because sports and politics are intertwined and have been in modern American history. To pretend that any host can “stick to sports” or “ignore pure politics” is idiotic. And the reason ESPN is pushing that isn’t because it hurt their ratings but because of the narrative that

If Tim Tebow was on ESPN and was pushing anti-abortion and far right religious preachings would any of us like that?

I can answer the first question, because that’s one of mechanics and not policy.

If you need a thesaurus for feckless and craven, you really shouldn’t be passing judgment on people who don’t.

First rule of being a feckless suit: you don't talk about being a feckless suit.