For that kind of money, I don’t understand why you wouldn’t get an S2000 instead

This stuff doesn't always equal to ego protection. It can also have to do with brand protection. They're brand is big tough guys. They're successful for a reason, and I would assume that curating their public image is a large part of it

I’m surprised that the news if Alfa being outsold in Europe by the f’ing Lancia Ypsilon, which is only sold in Italy, would have made the Morning Shift

The title of the article is “Let’s Debunk The Idea That It’s Not Safe To Use Cruise Control In The Rain”, which is patently false. I’m not writing blog articles for thousands to see about never leaving your house because the world isn’t safe. On the other hand, I’m not writing articles for thousands to see that have…

I feel like you are arguing semantics on generally good advice. Rainy conditions often require high variability in your speed in order to maintain safe driving conditions. Therefore, in general, the safer option is to not use cruise control in the rain. The title of this article doesn’t really reflect that

It’s funny to me that the EU is jumping from one existential crises to the next, but the bureaucrats still find the time to regulate something so petty that local laws would perfectly suffice. 

Lol, that Tesla deal sounds like a really great way for the Chinese government to inherit a state of the art battery manufacturing plant in about 5 years. I’m not saying that Tesla has no chance, but it seems like the Chinese government has nothing to do but benefit and roll the dice

Counter point: Subaru should have tried more than resting on their laurels and developed a platform that elegantly supports plug in architecture. When everyone is shoving 30+ miles of electric only range with just as much trail capability, people will start looking elsewhere

The downside to ingredient plug-ins is road tripping, but honestly, I've never really driven an efficient car that was also a great road trip vehicle

If FCA wants to lead with Jeep same Ram while staying relevant, a good way to get two birds stoned at once would be to make plug in versions of Jeeps and Rams. Plug in trucks and SUVs are really impossible to beat. Zero emission commuting, and powerful utility at the same time? Sign me up

My back hurts from having to constantly look down amongst the proletariat while perched on my glorious velour throne

give me insanely plush velour, or gtfo

40 thousand miles is already past its expected life span

HFS, this thing hasn't been worth $4.5k since it first started leaving dealer lots. This thing is a liability at best

They’re crazy good deals, but the C4 is a real solid step below the C5 in performance and quality

The C5 is one of, if not the, best sports car deals available right now. That doesn't mean it's not a bland mess. I find the exact front and back of the car to be good (I miss round taillights), but any other view is not the greatest

I cannot fathom preferring the styling of a C5 to this. It's not perfect, but my God. The C5 was styled by a drunk Boy Scout leader carving a bar of soap

Pull a Lincoln, but at least offer something unique in the sedan space. The A7 and A5 are desirable products, and Cadillac has shown that they can design some lust worthy fastbacks. I can't imagine that anyone is going to break into the generic luxury sedan market before it collapses and coalesces around two or three…

I’m of the opinion that Cadillac should have made an A5 and A7 competitor, and called it a day on non-CUV vehicles. Instead, we get these worry positioned sedans that no one is going to be terribly interested in

Honestly, good for them. They know that they won't make money off of it, so they're focusing on other things. Everyone isn't sad about no Mazda Speed, they're sad about no used Mazda Speed