I think the only real problem was the grafted-on love triangle, which was clearly a concession to standard Hollywood films.

Douglas Adams is the architect of the film version and said explicitly that he wanted each incarnation of the story to be their own thing and work for their own medium, so fans who are unhappy…

.

It’s a privately owned company that’s been in the same billionaire family for decades. They pre-date McDonald’s, which is where McDonald’s got the idea for the drive-thru. (Something like half of all fast food franchises started in the same relatively small area in Southern California.)

I keep forgetting Utah and Oregon happened. And they always complain about the Californication of their states.

They could do all of that in dozens of cities around the United States with lower real estate and operating costs. They haven’t. They don’t want to.

New Yorkers need to get over In-N-Out.

It’s almost as though he’s trying to increase his social media standing.

The In-N-Out trucks are only in two of the four states In-N-Out operates in:

Wait, you like a burger that costs double what it costs at In-N-Out more? I wonder if there’s a connection.

In-N-Out has no need to come to New York City. There’s much more of the country where they could expand their model, which relies on shipping never-frozen meat from local farms daily, rather than NYC. (They could set up shop in Chicago in hours, for instance.)

The only ones who are obsessed with In-N-Out coming to New…

Can we talk about your stock image? Why the hell is a Double-Double paired with potato chips? I know In-N-Out fries are a niche taste at best, but Lay’s potato chips? And this made it into a stock image gallery?

Is this the full coverage of the panel, or will it be expanded?

It means there’s a reason to subscribe to the stupid Warner Brothers app in a few months.

He’s never going to sue them. As dumb as he clearly seems to be, he understands how libel laws work.

This also applies to all the other millionaires who complain about how unfair the media is to them. If they actually broke the law, there would be an instant lawsuit.

The same reason they don’t say he lies: It’s requiring knowledge of what’s going on inside of his brain to make a definitive statement like that, and he expressly denies racist intent.

No one should have to remove their shoes. We do it so that a famously inept agency can show visible proof they’re doing “something” to make travelers more secure.

That said, we should also prevent stupid people who try to wear their shoes and belt through the detectors, under the current system, from flying at all,…

There should be nothing left handed about it.

I’d love for a bipartisan group in Congress to ask for the TSA to justify some of their security theater. No one should be taking off their shoes, for instance. There was one attempted shoe bombing once and it failed. If there’s a Pants Bomber, are we all going to have to take off our pants in the airport?

Anything…

It’ll be amusing to see if she references what happened to her powers in West Coast Avengers, which she identified there as being necessary to work as part of a team book.

Same deal with the artists.

Wait until any of these folks see A) how far it is from civilization and B) what the few hotel rooms out there (especially the Little A’Le’Inn) cost. Market forces will keep the base (and, by extension, these idiots) safe.