... unless you can cover the bodies with giant bags of cash, in which case VIVA FUTBOL!!!
... unless you can cover the bodies with giant bags of cash, in which case VIVA FUTBOL!!!
This is an actual parody account, right? There's no way a person with a working brain is writing this nonsense. Call me a racist again, like you know shit. It's hysterical.
You mean like all the other examples of sports fans making light of the Marathon bombing after Boston victories? You're a fucking moron. Go back to your coloring book.
Sam, thanks for finding this, but your headline sucks.
Usually you don't see anger misdirected quite as succinctly and thoroughly as this. Well done.
Punch-dancer at 0:24 FTW.
And almost 74 percent of the country prefers something other than classic rock...
Yes, I'm aware of that. Admittedly, he gives up on the ball, but with a defender bearhugging him to keep him from changing direction, it would have been difficult not to. This isn't a matter of what would have happened in my fantasy dream sequence where Gronkowski is allowed to play the ball and he magically cuts back…
When did I use the word conspiracy? Where did I use that word? I don't think it's a specific "let's see Charlotte beat Boston" thing, I think the referees got all chickenshit about potentially giving away the game to the road team, and it's really not that crazy. It happens all the time, in every sport. Officials are…
Actually no. I thought it was a pretty auspicious time to make the call on what was essentially a brand-new penalty, but it's in the book, and I don't begrudge the referees their job of calling it. Just because I don't like last night's call doesn't make me a homer, but you stick to whatever reductive narrative…
Or, you could watch the whole play, and see that Gronkowski was getting mugged well before the catch was made. Not to mention the fact that, yes, DPI is subjective. So why did the official closest to the play, with the clearest look, throw a flag? And then picked it up after a conversation with guys stationed further…
What - and I ask this in all sincerity - in the FUCK are you talking about?
This is really disgusting, and I'm ashamed of Deadspin for putting it out there. Think of the influence this is having on children if they see it! Just imagine an impressionable young person, sitting at home, seeing this video getting all this attention and thinking, "Hey, it's totally OK if I do that too!"
I bet things would've been illuminated for you if you read past the title.
Yeah the YouTube bandy video rabbit hole totally swallowed me up for about a half hour as a result of this story.
This is really incredible, and I'm finding the action to be far more interesting than the conventional baseball broadcast. Something about the narrative nature of one camera, looking around at the interesting points, rather than the antiseptic feel of switching from one nonchalant player to another.
It was obviously a fucking joke, you fucking hack. And yes, the massacre of three innocent people, and the dismemberment of many many others, is off-limits. Sorry to limit your pool of subjects for crass humor.
Nope. Just out of bounds. Also I don't know who Doug Exeter is, or who his 10,000,000 fans are, and I don't care. The "joke" was out-and-out stupid, and the product of a culture that has no problem with anonymous idiocy.
It's really not "clever" or "a very funny comment." It's just provocative, and just like the audiences at Andrew Dice Clay shows, all the dittohead +1-ers on this thread are just applauding because OOOOOH SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING OUT OF BOUNDS.
It's probably better that he/she didn't, because nobody with a working temporal lobe would look at that comment and think, "nah, yeah, that's pretty good."