What we really need are debate moderators not working at the behest of profit seeking corporations and acting as mouthpieces for thus.
What we really need are debate moderators not working at the behest of profit seeking corporations and acting as mouthpieces for thus.
I just do not believe that you are going to see vigorous progressive airtime in a corporatocracy when the mainstream media is completely bought and paid for, existing on a spread sheet of a larger family of corporate holdings.
One big dirty club.
Every time I see him, I want him to have a show on MSNBC.
If the world’s leaders are sober minded, there would be little reason to have any faith in America upon us electing a Dem, because history suggests that we will install another batshit crazy Republican in four to eight years.
Tomato, is this what you are referring to?
This is apparently what happens when the choice is limited. (First past the post, and all that.)
IMO, we are currently living in a declining empire.
That is why she is the only other person besides Trump that cannot let the 2016 election go.
2016 featured two insurgent populist candidates (Bernie and Trump) following eight years of alleged halcyon Obama rule.
I lean that way as well.
Susan Sarandon is on a long list of culprits usually based on the pet grievance of the aggrieved and frustrated individual making the list.
Maybe. Possibly. Maybe even probably.
This guiding logic sounds wise, if we step back and look at the big picture, (not exactly our strong suit).