Laughable. Relative to your next to last paragraph, SEE: confirmed comments over years from Diane Feinstein. And she's just one. I could give you more but it would clearly fall on deaf ears.

No it doesn’t you dumb fucktard. And if you read the constitution and understood English you would realize it’s quite the opposite. (Noting, they actually use the term “government” in the constitution itself.). Jesus dealing with all of you snotty pretentious leftish assholes is exhausting. I can't educate every one…

You pretentious dumb fuck. (And the rest of you leftist socialist trash dumb fucks who are using this constitutional text like you know what you’re talking about.) At the time of the writing of the constitution, the term “regulated” meant “trained.” Further a militia - aw hell, do I need to explain the difference…

Wrong, wrong and wrong again. The specific right of which you so mockingly speak was never even before the SCOTUS before Heller. That question, of whether the second amendment right to bear arms was a personal right or not, had never been addressed. In fact, because until only the last 25 years or so under democrat…

You pretentious dumb fuck. (And the rest of you leftist socialist trash dumb fucks who are using this constitutional text like you know what you’re talking about.) At the time of the writing of the constitution, the term “regulated” meant “trained.” Further a militia - aw hell, do I need to explain the difference…

You pretentious dumb fuck. (And the rest of you leftist socialist trash dumb fucks who are using this constitutional text like you know what you’re talking about.) At the time of the writing of the constitution, the term “regulated” meant “trained.” Further a militia - aw hell, do I need to explain the difference…