There's no "facts" in a jury trial. There's only "evidence."

OP made a funny joke. You made a long, factually tenuous, and boring reply.

The "mob mentality" runs both ways.

The prosecutor decides who testifies in front of a grand jury. Full stop. That's it.

I would say "let the witness be torn to shreds."

This is the first time I've ever heard of a prosecutor allowing a defendant to testify, let alone enumerate the defense's case. Ever. In a grand jury trial.

The rest of America finds the St. Louis Police Department to be offensive. So fair is fair.

Excellent data.

Great case study for high speed rail.

Don't forget to add the 1+ hr to get from DC to Dulles, then the 1.5 hr wait time, then the 1+ hr to get from Logan to anywhere desirable.

These Blizzard cinematics always make me feel like a little kid again :)

Oh, I dig all of this- big studios controlling the means of distribution, while also funding the means of promotion. Totally with you on that.

I'm not trolling! I just want a screengrab with positive proof! Because everyone is constantly linking me to these citations that are really heavy on the ranting, and light on the evidence. So if I could have a link to a positive review that this woman was given by the guy she was sleeping with (or anything close to…

Cool. Just FYI, You're about the 10th GGer I've spoken to who hasn't been able to provide factual, positive citation to actually prove their narrative. Gawker cites its claims.

Cool. I don't have the patience to sift through 40 pages of ranting. So cite me a screengrab or two that are evidence that there is systemic corruption, if you could.

Your daughter CAN be anything she wants.

And you're free to feel like the actions and steadfast stances of your fringe group are somehow "mainstream."

Gamergate isn't comprised of "regular gamers."

But no one's actually provided any proof that "sex for goods" happened! Just the word of a guy who felt he was wronged.

"That is a fact."