Huh? What "argument" do you think I made? Please do tell, or can't you find that right now either?

Of course you don't remember because it never happened, but hey, don't let reality intrude on your emotions. If you KNOW you're right and if you know I am an asshole then that is all that matters. Let's not get bogged down an attempt to try and be somewhat objective here, it's a lost cause.

I had a much more...... un-PC like comment in mind, then thought better :P

Can you provide a link to "Elevator Guy" making that statement? Because I have nowhere found anything about this not even when looking on Watson's blog. At least there I would have expected her to point it out.

Odds are that's still one of the designs he approved. He's dead less than a year and I would bet their cycle is at least 12 months.

I am on a Mac Pro and have my iTunes library (both DB and content) stored on the internal drives, it's not a very fast experience most of the time either.

Actually I will pick one now. I have been thinking about this for the last two days and here is my position: Dawkins was absolutely correct in his posting. He sent it in the middle of a few thousand posts that were debating about the validity Watson's claim and both sides had and wouldn't be getting anywhere. All the…

And you would be thinking wrong. My problem is not with her raising the issues or even want to raise awareness to it. My problem is in her methods and the repeatedly self-victimization in order to score "ethic" points.

Oh snap, what an intelligent comeback from you.

"Hint: she doesn't, she stands as a valuable voice in the skeptic community."

What? Because I don't think his transgression was horrible horrible horrible and for these words he should hang / be burned at the stake I am not critical of him? I GET why he made that remark, the entire elevatorgate and the "discussions" around it were and are utterly stupid. So yeah, I can't blame him for the…

How would you like me to hold him responsible? Hold a book burning? Write a blog post condemning him for writing something that was, at worst, in bad taste? Tweet in outrage over his "totally misogynistic post"?

Dawins was complaining about the absurdity the argument has gotten to, that this was and is misrepresented by certain people isn't surprising though.

What does that "nope" apply to? That Watson is not responsible for what she writes or that I did give you the impression I don't think Dawkins is responsible for what he writes?

a.) How do you know that it was men who sent those message?

Sorry, but her harassing people is okay because she gets trolled by people on the net? If we talk about harassment then we should look at the entire picture, not just at one single moment. Which you said yourself was a non-moment, a non-event where all that happened was that she felt "something she didn't like". Or…

"her behavior after the fact does not interest me."

Watson escalated the moment she attacked McGraw from the podium. There are many ways you can deal with criticism, this was not a good one.

Yes, I am a misogynist here because I am disapproving of Watson and what she's doing (btw, I also disapprove of PZ Myers for his white knighting and Dawkins for his Dogma when it comes to his non-belief, guess that also makes me a mysandrist? Oh, sorry, that doesn't exist my bad).

You need to see her "sins" in the context of this. She never once engaged one of her critics in an honest way. She either belittled them or called them names, with heavy support fire from certain FTB bloggers and her horde of happy followers to whom she can do no wrong. It's her complete inability to even consider…