Oh it does. You need to play a little bit to get it, but it does.

As far as I know, there’s only one solution to each murder; the main storyline is ~5-7 hours, but there are some secrets to find as well. It’s not very long, but it’s really, really satisfying.

It’s actually a very good, fitting title. Trust me, it’ll make sense once you play.

I always thought the ban on TA presence in Northern Ireland was introduced as a part of Good Friday?

Nearly, but not completely; parts of TA were stationed in Northern Ireland, they just weren’t as actively involved.

Of course they co-opt the identity politics of subversive/progressive movements, because at the end of the day progressive identity politics is compatible with capitalism. What they can’t co-opt is radical economical agenda - but in order to see this, the American left needs to stop looking at everything through the…

And they always have. I’ve been a fan of their games since the first Europa Universalis and I still find myself going back (like once a year or so) to EUII as a lighter, more casual, nostalgia-flavoured alternative to EUIV and CKII.

Right, so, I know this is going to sound controversial - and I admit I haven’t read the book - but: I think that it is far from obvious that Perry is a rapist; and I think that this ambiguity is intentional on the part of the show’s creators/writers.

It’s probably not virgins, it’s chilled grapes. I’m 100% serious, look it up; it’s actually pretty important for many Muslim feminists.

Yeah, but judging from this interview, we’re only going to get more Meltdowns, more Holy Immos, more pre-nerf Entropic Gazes and so on. Well, time to start looking for another CCG/online tactics game.

TBH, this attitude towards Meltdown is... well, let’s just say - weirdly optimistic. One thing to know about Duelyst’s community is that when they criticise a card, they tend to do it in an unexpectedly precise, specific and analytic manner; people are writing pages-long analyses about how different cards affect the…

There is no reason not to like Jim Sterling, that’s a blasphemy, pure and simple; but otherwise, yeah, that’s the thing that’s been bugging me as well - people on the Internet don’t need personal profit as a motivation, sometimes the fact that someone loses (vaguely) the same amount as them is enough. And that’s scary.

Well, I think some of these people - you know, the ones calling themselves South Carolina Secessionist Party - have no problem with “betraying” the US.

I’m obviously happy, and short-term this is great news, but there’s one thing I don’t really understand. In Europe (well, most of it, anyway), if you get news like that (and you consider yourself “progressive” or whatever), the usual reaction is somehow mixed with healthy scepticism or a more suspicious attitude;…

I’m pretty sure radicalism shouldn’t be compatible with willingness to “support” any corporation, no matter how culturally progressive.

I’m pretty sure radicalism shouldn’t be compatible with willingness to “support” any corporation, no matter how culturally progressive.

Well, it seems it’s worked for her just fine. Go America.

No, it’s Peter Thiel.

How can you measure weight with a measuring cup?

Let me just drop it here: