thecreepingbam
thecreepingbam
thecreepingbam

People tend to hover because there tends to be piss on the seats at some point of the day. There is piss on the seats because people hover. They have like a system failure in their brains. Either get a toilet seat cover or place toilet paper in a pseudo cover and sit down.

Are you insane or just an asshole?

I burst out laughing when I saw this cover. Like who the hell thought the "Sensitive Poet" look would be believable on this skeezeball?

Especially if we think they are guilty. She did her job.

The whole quote is up there. Where does it suggest anything like that? Oh. NOWHERE.

Expressing concern for women and children is not accusing men of not being victims of war. Christ on a cracker. If you don't want to like someone, just don't like them. Don't make shit up.

A thousand years ago I read an interview with the female lawyer who represented one of the men in the gang rape of a woman on a pool table in Massachusetts. The crux of the interview was "how can a woman represent a man accused of rape?" And her response was, our legal system entitles everyone to to the best

That's the first thing I thought while reading this. Do these people think we should simply abandon anyone accused of crimes we deem too heinous ?

Is this the new political tactic against all lawyers — find out their client roster and impugn them for doing their job to represent them? Not everyone is in a position to cherry pick clients for whom they have no conflict (whether as a solo practitioner or associate at a large BigLaw firm) and certainly, when the

Yeah, that didn't happen.

Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today's warfare, victims. Women are often left with the

Boy, wouldn't it be awful to have a president who believed that everyone deserves legal representation, regardless of the crime they are charged with? Like you know, what is considered someone's constitutional rights? I mean, fuck, you know, I think it's ridiculous to give shit someone actually doing their job.

If you're going to judge lawyers for defending people accused of terrible crimes, you might as well throw away the entire justice system and the constitution while you're at it.

It's got to start somewhere. I'm sure Richardson isn't the only person in fashion that takes advantage of models.

He looks so sad.

I bet he needs a hug.

From a running lawn mower.

So much yuck going on here. Terry Richardson doesn't use consenting models because power and control plays a large factor in what gets him off. Just like any other rapist or abuser. He likes coercion.

Artist or predator?