It’s OK, social justice bloggers have a waiver on hypocrisy, so it doesn’t count.

Similarly you’re focusing on one criticism the article leveled, which was the potential danger of instruction from that one scene. The deeper and more concerning elements of the show, which the article identifies and explains clearly, are that it glorifies the deceased in a suicide, it reinforces the lie that other…

Are you suggesting that overt force against a citizen who represents absolutely no threat to officers, other bystanders, or themselves is an acceptable response to an act of civil disobedience?

Yes, you are definitely taking crazy pills if you think a 16 year old at the border of the US with several bottles of liquid meth did ANYTHING of his own accord when prompted by two armed men to do something.

Lol, no problem. It’s a common typo where you accidentally use logic and reason instead of an objectively insane reality.

Those are not the type of driver AIDS that are being discussed here. They’re taking about lane assist and collision avoidance technologies that deploy brakes automatically or physically steer the car against the drivers inputs.

“It might encourage BMW et al to release purer versions of their sports related models priced at least 60% above standard models despite having less features.”

So is jaywalking, tax evasion, importing undeclared goods, etc.

He had a majority for two years, the Republicans took the majority in the 2010 midterm and held it for the next 6 years. In the two years he had the willing legislature he helped move through Dodd-Frank, ACA, American Recovery stimulus package, and extended the Bush tax cuts with the 2010 Tax Relief Act.

He had 8 years with a deadlocked legislature who openly admitted they would do anything to stonewall the presidents agenda, no matter how stupid. Spare me the entitled right talking points about how we oir president support and patience. Fuck that noise, he wanted to boss, he can damn well get shit done or reap the…

Phew, for a second there I almost forgot your writers were all wildly zealous anti-gun nuts that put demonizing firearm owners just under social justice blogging on your list of Facebook hobbies.

Yes, thanks, I replied to my first post since there’s now evidence that apparently suggests he had knowledge and intent to do harm, which certainly changes the narrative dramatically.

Your headline wasn’t shameful, and the subtext is a very real keynote for the story. The reality is that this is an example of the crimes we don’t really have solid classifications for, and women have historically been prominent victims of these types of crimes, and more often than not those victims are either…

Since law enforcement has now identified that they have evidence suggesting that Rivello was aware that his victim was epileptic, if not photosensitive, so the allegations clearly indicate he was intending harm. Very different story, and something that the victim might have thought prudent to mention when he was doing…

Except there does not appear to be any compelling evidence to suggest that the first person 1) knew that the person was epileptic 2) thought that a GIF that has been around for forever would actually trigger a seizure. Even if he knew the man suffered epilepsy, only 3-5% of epilepsy patients are photo sensitive, which…

If you think that the person you are now is going to be the person you’ll be in ten years, I implore you to talk to anyone outside of their twenties.

Except guys like this don’t zipper in, they fly as far forward as they can then try to force their way in slowing down traffic in their lane because they’re the special snowflake.

It doesn’t mean he’s guilty either, despite the fact that Jezebel seems to be under the impression that allegation and conviction are synonymous.

Ha ha, Archer’s suits are literally one button, so yeah, there’s some problems with the Cosplay. To their defense, I’m guessing you want to invest as little as possible in a suit you’ll ruin by fabric painting, I’m not sure that pocket is even real.

1) Comparing a pair of human beings to a domesticated pet is absurd, dehumanizing, and utterly useless to any serious conversation.